Adoptionism, sometimes called "dynamic monarchianism, is a "nontrinitarian "theological doctrine which holds that "Jesus was adopted as the "Son of God at his "baptism, his "resurrection, or his "ascension. According to "Epiphanius's account of the "Ebionites, the group believed that Jesus was chosen on account of his "sinless devotion to the "will of God.
Adoptionism was declared "heresy at the end of the 2nd century and was rejected by the "Synods of Antioch and the "First Council of Nicaea, which defined the "orthodox doctrine of the "Trinity and identified the man Jesus with the eternally begotten Son or "Word of God in the "Nicene Creed.
The "Gospel of Mark is believed by most "modern scholars to be the first of the four "canonical "gospels to have been written, dating from the time of the "fall of Jerusalem in AD 70. Mark gives prominent mention to the destruction of the "Second Temple and appears to have provided source material for "Matthew and "Luke. Many details found in later writings do not appear in the earliest manuscripts of Mark, including the phrase "Son of God" at Mark 1:1. Ehrman notes that this places the first use of the title "Son of God" for Jesus at his baptism, suggesting that Mark's gospel may reflect early Adoptionist views. The words "Today I have begotten you" are omitted from Mark, however; it is therefore generally believed to have less Adoptionist tendencies than the lost, non-canonical "Gospel of the Hebrews.
Adoptionist theology may also be reflected in canonical "epistles, the earliest of which pre-date the writing of the gospels. The letters of "Paul the Apostle, for example, do not mention a "virgin birth of Christ. Paul describes Jesus as "born of a woman, born under the "law" and "as to his "human nature was a descendant of David" in the "Epistle to the Galatians and the "Epistle to the Romans. Many interpreters, however, take his statements in "Philippians 2 to imply that Paul believed Jesus to have existed as equal to God before his "incarnation. The "Book of Hebrews, a contemporary sermon by an unknown author, describes God as saying "You are my son; today I have begotten you." (Hebrews 1:5) The latter phrase, a quote of Psalm 2:7, could reflect an early Adoptionist view.
The first known exponent of Adoptionism in the 2nd century is "Theodotus of Byzantium. According to "Hippolytus of Rome ("Philosophumena, VII, xxiii) Theodotus taught that Jesus was a man born of a virgin, according to the Council of Jerusalem, that he lived like other men, and was most pious; but that at his baptism in the Jordan the "Christ" came down upon the man Jesus in the likeness of a dove. (Luke 3:22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased. Luke 4:1 And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,) Therefore, wonders (Greek dynameis) were not wrought in him until the Spirit (which Theodotus called Christ) came down and was manifested in Him. ("Philosophumena, VII, xxiii) The belief was declared heretical by "Pope Victor I.
The 2nd-century work "Shepherd of Hermas also taught that Jesus was a virtuous man filled with the Holy Spirit and adopted as the Son. While the Shepherd of Hermas was popular and sometimes bound with the canonical scriptures, it didn't retain canonical status, if it ever had it.
In the 3rd century, "Paul of Samosata, "Patriarch of Antioch, promoted Adoptionism. He said Jesus had been a man who kept himself sinless and achieved union with God. His views, however, did not neatly fit in either of the two main forms of Monarchianism.["citation needed]
"Spanish Adoptionism was a theological position which was articulated in "Umayyad and "Christian-held regions of the "Iberian peninsula in the 8th and 9th centuries. The issue seems to have begun with the claim of archbishop "Elipandus of Toledo that – in respect to his human nature – Christ was adoptive "Son of God. Another leading advocate of this Christology was "Felix of Urgel. In Spain, Adoptionism was opposed by "Beatus of Liebana, and in the "Carolingian territories, the Adoptionist position was condemned by "Pope Hadrian I, "Alcuin of York, "Agobard, and officially in Carolingian territory by the Council of Frankfurt (794).
Despite the shared name of "Adoptionism" the Spanish Adoptionist Christology appears to have differed sharply from the Adoptionism of early Christianity. Spanish advocates predicated the term adoptivus of Christ only in respect to his humanity; once the divine Son "emptied himself" of divinity and "took the form of a servant" (Philippians 2:7), Christ's human nature was "adopted" as divine.
Historically, many scholars have followed the Adoptionists' Carolingian opponents in labeling Spanish Adoptionism as a minor revival of “"Nestorian” Christology. John C. Cavadini has challenged this notion by attempting to take the Spanish Christology in its own Spanish/North African context in his study, The Last Christology of the West: Adoptionism in Spain and Gaul, 785–820.
A third wave was the revived form ("Neo-Adoptionism") of "Peter Abelard in the 12th century. Later, various modified and qualified Adoptionist tenets emerged from some theologians in the 14th century. "Duns Scotus (1300) and "Durandus of Saint-Pourçain (1320) admit the term Filius adoptivus in a qualified sense. In more recent times the Jesuit "Gabriel Vásquez, and the Lutheran divines "Georgius Calixtus and "Johann Ernst Immanuel Walch, have defended Adoptionism as essentially orthodox.
A form of Adoptionism surfaced in "Unitarianism during the 18th century as the "virgin birth was increasingly denied by Unitarians["citation needed]. In the 19th century the term "Psilanthropism, was applied by such as "Samuel Taylor Coleridge who so called his own view that Jesus was the son of Joseph.
A similar form of Adoptionism was expressed in the writings of "James Strang, a "Latter Day Saint leader who founded the "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Strangite) after the "death of Joseph Smith in 1844. In his "Book of the Law of the Lord, a purported work of ancient scripture found and translated by Strang, he offers an essay entitled "Note on the Sacrifice of Christ" in which he explains his unique (for Mormonism as a whole) doctrines on the subject. Jesus Christ, said Strang, was the natural-born son of "Mary and "Joseph, who was chosen from before all time to be the Savior of mankind, but who had to be born as an ordinary mortal of two human parents (rather than being begotten by the Father or the "Holy Spirit) to be able to truly fulfill his Messianic role. Strang claimed that the earthly Christ was in essence "adopted" as God's son at birth, and fully revealed as such during the "Transfiguration. After proving himself to God by living a perfectly sinless life, he was enabled to provide an acceptable sacrifice for the sins of men, prior to his "resurrection and "ascension.
Adoptionism is one of two main forms of "monarchianism (the other is "modalism, which regards "Father" and "Son" as two historical or "soteriological roles of a single divine Person). Adoptionism (also known as "dynamic monarchianism) denies the eternal "pre-existence of Christ, and although it explicitly affirms his deity subsequent to events in his life, many classical "trinitarians claim that the doctrine implicitly denies it by denying the constant hypostatic union of the eternal Logos to the human nature of Jesus. Under Adoptionism Jesus is currently divine and has been since his adoption, although he is not equal to the Father, per "my Father is greater than I" (John 14:28). and as such is a kind of "subordinationism.
Adoptionism was one position in a long series of Christian disagreements about the precise nature of Christ (see "Christology) in the developing dogma of the "Trinity, an attempt to explain the relationship between Jesus of Nazareth, both as man and God, and God the Father while confidently claiming to be uncompromisingly "monotheistic. It differs significantly from the doctrine of the Trinity that was later affirmed by the "ecumenical councils.
Some scholars see Adoptionist concepts in the "Gospel of Mark and in the writings of the "Apostle Paul. According to this view, though Mark has Jesus as the Son of God, references occurring at the strategic points in 1:1 ("The beginning of the gospel about Jesus Christ, the Son of God", but not in all versions, see "Mark 1), 5:7 ("What do you want with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God?") and 15:39 ("Surely this man was the Son of God!"), the concept of the "Virgin Birth of Jesus had not been developed or elucidated at the time of the writing of this early Christian text. By the time the Gospels of "Luke and "Matthew were written, Jesus is identified as being the Son of God from the time of birth. Finally, the "Gospel of John portrays him as the pre-existent Word ("Greek: λόγος) "as existing "in the beginning".
Hebrews describes Christ as God’s Son in language which seems to denote pre-existence more clearly than anything we have met so far [...] At the same time, there is more ‘adoptionist’ language in Hebrews than in any other NT document.
The Saviour, jesus Christ, who from the fullness (the pleroma) of the Father descended on earth, is identified with the Logos, but initially not entirely with the Only Begotten Son. In john 1:14 is written, after all, that his glory was as of the Only Begotten, from which is concluded that his glory must be distinguished from this (7, 3b). When the Logos or Saviour descended, Sophia, according to Theodotus, provided a piece of flesh (sarkion), namely a carnal body, also called ‘spiritual seed’ (1, 1).
[Per Jesus and Adoptionism] how does one understand the title “Son of God” when it is applied to Jesus? The answer is to be found in the Adoptionist movement within early Christianity. The Adoptionist trajectory in early Christianity begins with the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist. According to the usual Adoptionist formulations, it was at his moment of baptism that Jesus moved into this special relationship or metaphorical “sonship” with God – not at his conception or virgin birth. [...] the oldest Greek manuscripts of and quotations from Luke render the key verse in question as follows. "Now when all the people were baptized, and when Jesus also had been baptized and was praying, the heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “You are my son; today I have begotten you” (Luke 3:21-22)." [...] the wording regarding the baptism of Jesus is also to be found in Hebrews 1:5a, Hebrews 5:5, and Acts 13:33. This same wording is also found in Psalms 2:7 in reference to David and in the apocryphal Gospel of the Ebionites in reference to Jesus’ baptism.
Ps 2:7-8 is also quoted in 1 Clem 36:4 and in Just. Dial. 122:6, whilst only verse seven of Ps 2 is found in the Ebionite Gospel (fr. 4) and in Just. Dial. 88:8, 103:6. The quotation from Ps 2:7 that occurs in Heb 1:5 and 5:5 found its way into Hebrews via the early Jewish and early Christian traditions.
The most prominent example of Angel Adoptionism from the early Church would have to be the document known as The Shepherd of Hermass. In The Shepherd, the savior is an angel called the “angel of justification,” who seems to be identified with the archangel Michael. Although the angel is often understood to be Jesus, he is never named as Jesus.
[W]e can still observe within the Gospel (especially in Mark, which has no miraculous birth story, and also even in Paul) the remnants of a version of Christology in which Jesus was born a man but became God at his baptism. This idea, later named the heresy of adoptionism (God adopting Jesus as his Son), was not quite stamped out until the Middle Ages.
|"Wikisource has the text of the "1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Adoptianism.|