Powered by
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia

Bias in education refers to real or perceived "bias in the "educational system.


Bias in school textbooks[edit]

The content of school textbooks is often the issue of debate, as their target audience is young people, and the term "whitewashing" is the one commonly used to refer to selective removal of critical or damaging evidence or comment.[1][2][3] The "reporting of military atrocities in history is extremely controversial, as in the case of the "Holocaust (or "Holocaust denial) and the "Winter Soldier Investigation of the "Vietnam War. The representation of every society's flaws or misconduct is typically downplayed in favor of a more nationalist or patriotic view. Also, "Christians and other religionists have at times attempted to block the teaching of the theory of "evolution in schools, as evolutionary theory appears to contradict their "religious beliefs; the teaching of "creationism as a science is likewise blocked from many public schools. In the context of secondary-school education, the way facts and history are presented greatly influences the interpretation of contemporary thought, opinion and socialization. One legitimate argument for censoring the type of information disseminated is based on the inappropriate quality of such material for the young. The use of the "inappropriate" distinction is in itself controversial, as it can be used to enforce wider and more politically motivated censorship.["citation needed]

Religious bias[edit]

Many countries and states have guidelines against bias in education, but they are not always implemented. The guidelines of the "California Department of Education (Code 60044) state the following: "No "religious belief or practice may be held up to ridicule and no religious group may be portrayed as inferior." "Any explanation or description of a religious belief or practice should be present in a manner that does not encourage or discourage belief or indoctrinate the student in any particular religious belief."[4]

On the basis of these guidelines, the Board of Education of "California corrected in 2005 misrepresentations of "Judaism, "Islam and "Hinduism in schoolbooks.[5] Many of these misrepresentations were described as biased, erroneuous or culturally derogatory. All 500 changes proposed by Jews and about 100 changes proposed by Muslims were accepted.

By country or region[edit]

United States[edit]

Many recent allegations against the United States have surfaced about the hiding of many historical facts from the public through public education and thus luring the public to believing that the actions taken by the U.S. government are justified and provide a global benefit.["citation needed]

On the political left, professors "Howard Zinn and "James Loewen allege that United States history as presented in school textbooks has a conservative bias. "A People's History of the United States, by American historian and political scientist Zinn, seeks to present American history through the eyes of groups rarely heard in mainstream histories. Loewen spent two years at the Smithsonian Institution studying and comparing twelve American history textbooks widely used throughout the United States. His findings were published in "Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your High School History Textbook Got Wrong.[6]

On the political right, professor "Larry Schweikart makes the opposite case: he alleges in his 48 Liberal Lies About American History that United States history education has a liberal bias.[7]

In a landmark book called "The Trouble with Textbooks," Dr. Gary A. Tobin and Dennis R. Ybarra show how some American textbooks contain anti-Semitic versions of Jewish history and faith, particularly in relation to Christianity and Islam. The authors found that some U.S. textbooks "tend to discredit the ties between Jews and the Land of Israel. Israel is blamed for starting wars in the region and being colonialist. Jews are charged with deicide in the killing of Jesus. All in all, there are repeated misrepresentations that cross the line into bigotry."[8]

Middle East[edit]

Palestinian school text books have come under repeated criticism for anti-Israeli bias. An independent study of Palestinian textbooks by Professor "Nathan Brown of George Washington University in Washington, DC, found that "Palestine National Authority-authored books avoid treating anything controversial regarding Palestinian national identity, and while highly nationalistic, do not incite hatred, violence and anti-Semitism.

An analysis of Israeli textbooks in 2000 by the "Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace (CMIP), found that there was no indoctrination against the Arabs as a nation, nor a negative presentation of Islam. However in 2012, "Nurit Peled-Elhanan, a professor of language and education at the "Hebrew University of Jerusalem, published Palestine in Israeli School Books: Ideology and Propaganda in Education, an account of her study of the contents of Israeli school books finding that Israeli school books do in fact promote "racism against and negative images of Arabs, and prepare Israelis children for compulsory military service.

South Asia[edit]


In 1982 the "NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) issued guidelines for the rewriting of schoolbooks.[9] It stipulated that: "Characterization of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Muslims is forbidden."[10] In April 1989 the "West Bengal Board of Secondary Education had issued instructions to schools and publishers of textbooks that "Muslim rule should never attract any "criticism. Destruction of "temples by Muslim rulers and invaders should not be mentioned."[11] Schools and publishers have been asked to ignore and delete mention of forcible conversions to Islam. Some academicians have felt that these "corrections" were politically motivated and that they are censorship.[12]

"Arun Shourie criticized these changes in schoolbooks and claimed: The most extensive deletions are ordered in regard to the chapter on ""Aurangzeb's policy on religion". Every allusion to what he actually did to the Hindus, to their temples, to the very leitmotif of his rule – to spread the sway of Islam – are directed to be excised from the book. ... "In a word, no forcible conversions, no "massacres, no destruction of temples. ... Muslim historians of those times are in raptures at the heap of Kafirs [sic] who have been dispatched to hell. Muslim historians are forever lavishing praise on the ruler for the temples he has destroyed, ... Law books like The Hedaya prescribe exactly the options to which these little textbooks alluded. All whitewashed away. Objective "whitewash for objective history. And today if anyone seeks to restore truth to these textbooks, the shout, "Communal rewriting of history.""[13]

History textbooks and schoolbooks written by Marxist historian "Romila Thapar have been criticized for being biased.[14][15]


Bias in education has been a common feature in the curriculum of many "South Asian countries. According to Waghmar, many of the "oriental societies are plagued by visceral nationalism and post-imperial neurosis where state-sanctioned dogmas suppress eclectic historical readings.[16] Issues such as the preaching of hatred and obscurantism and the distortion of history in "Pakistan have led the international scholars to suggest the need for coordinated efforts amongst the historians to produce a composite history of the "subcontinent as a common "South Asian reader.[17] Bias against Indians and "Hindus, as well as other religious minorities, have been found in Pakistani schoolbooks.[18] However, Nelson here stresses the need for any "educational reform to be based at the needs of the level of local communities.[19]

The bias in Pakistani textbooks was studied by Rubina Saigol, Pervez Hoodbhoy, K. K. Aziz, I. A. Rahman, Mubarak Ali, A. H. Nayyar, Ahmed Saleem, "Yvette Rosser and others.

A study by Nayyar & Salim (2003) that was conducted with 30 experts of Pakistan's education system, found that the textbooks contain statements that seek to create hate against Hindus. There was also an emphasis on "Jihad, Shahadat, wars and military heroes. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes. Some of the problems in Pakistani textbooks cited in the report were: "Insensitivity to the existing religious diversity of the nation"; "Incitement to militancy and violence, including encouragement of Jehad and Shahadat"; a "glorification of war and the use of force"; "Inaccuracies of fact and omissions that serve to substantially distort the nature and significance of actual events in our history"; "Perspectives that encourage "prejudice, "bigotry and "discrimination towards fellow citizens, especially women and religious minorities, and other towards nations" and "Omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical selfawareness among students".[20]

These problems still seem to persist: The Curriculum Wing of the Federal Ministry of Education rejected a textbook in December 2003 because of two serious objections: The textbook contained the text of letter of a non-Muslim, and it contained the story of a family were both husband and wife worked and were sharing their household chores. In February 2004, a textbook was disapproved by the Curriculum Wing because it didn't contain enough material on jihad.[21]

Pakistani textbooks were relatively unbiased up to 1972, but were rewritten and completely altered under Bhutto's and especially under Zia's (1977–88) rule.[22] The bias in "Pakistani textbooks was also documented by "Yvette Rosser (2003). She wrote that "in the past few decades, social studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used as locations to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy makers have attempted to inculcate towards their "Hindu neighbours", and that as a result "in the minds of generations of Pakistanis, indoctrinated by the 'Ideology of Pakistan' are lodged fragments of hatred and suspicion."[23]

Professors who have been critical of Pakistani politics or corruption have are sometimes discriminated against. Dr. Parvez Hoodbhoy, who was also a critic of Pakistani politics, had troubles leaving the country for a lecture in the Physics department at "MIT, because he was denied a NOC (No Objection Certificate) necessary for travels abroad.[24]

One of the omissions in Pakistani textbooks is "Operation Gibraltar. Operation Gibraltar, which provoked the Indian Army attack on "Lahore, is not mentioned in most history textbooks. According to Pakistani textbooks, Lahore was attacked without any provocation on the part of the Pakistani army.[25] The rule of Islamic invaders like Mahmud of Gahzni is glorified, while the much more peaceful Islamic ruler "Akbar is often ignored in Pakistani textbooks.

The Pakistani Curriculum document for classes K-V stated in 1995 that "at the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to":

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Sadker, David. "Seven Forms of Bias in Instructional Materials". sadker.org. Retrieved 3 September 2015. 
  2. ^ Strauss, Valerie (12 September 2014). "Proposed Texas textbooks are inaccurate, biased and politicized, new report finds". washingtonpost.com. Washington Post. Retrieved 3 September 2015. 
  3. ^ Czitrom, Daniel (22 March 2010). "Texas school board whitewashes history". cnn.com. CNN. Retrieved 3 September 2015. 
  4. ^ California State Law, Education Code 60044, Standards for Evaluating Instructional Materials for Social Content, 2000 Edition Archived February 9, 2014, at the "Wayback Machine.. Retrieved on 15 June 2008
  5. ^ [1]
  6. ^ "People's History United States, Jan 26 2000 - Video - C-SPAN.org". C-SPAN.org. 
  7. ^ "48 Liberal Lies American History, Sep 23 2008 - Video - C-SPAN.org". C-SPAN.org. 
  8. ^ "U.S. Textbooks: 'Jesus was Palestinian'". Israel National News. 
  9. ^ (Indian Express 17 January 1982, New Delhi; Shourie 1998)
  10. ^ (Elst 1992)
  11. ^ (Shourie 1998)
  12. ^ (The Statesman, 21 May 1989)
  13. ^ Arun Shourie (1998)
  14. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-08-14. Retrieved 2015-02-04.  "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-02-06. Retrieved 2015-02-04. .
  15. ^ http://hindureview.com/2014/02/20/critique-wendy-donigers-hindus-alternative-history/
  16. ^ Waghmar, B. (2005). Pakistan Studies: The State of the Craft["permanent dead link]. "Dawn. 27 February. p. 5. Retrieved on 9 June 2008.
  17. ^ Verghese, B.G. (2004). Myth and hate as history. "The Hindu. 23 June. Retrieved on 7 June 2008.
  18. ^ Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr, The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: The Jama`at-i Islami of Pakistan (University of California Press, 1994) p121-122
  19. ^ Nelson, M.J. (2006). Muslims, Markets, and the Meaning of ‘A Good Education’ in Pakistan. Asian Survey. 46(5). pp. 699-720.
  20. ^ (Nayyar & Salim 2003)
  21. ^ (Nayyar 2004)
  22. ^ "'Pakistani social studies textbooks creating havoc'". 15 January 2006. 
  23. ^ (Rosser 2003)
  24. ^ [2]
  25. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-02-17. Retrieved 2015-02-04. 
  26. ^ (National Bureau of Curriculum and Textbooks Federal Ministry of Education, 1995 Government of Pakistan. Pervez Hoodbhoy - What Are They Teaching In Pakistani Schools Today? "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-07-01. Retrieved 2015-02-04. )

External links[edit]

) ) WikipediaAudio is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the WikiMedia Foundation.