|Rights by beneficiary|
|Other groups of rights|
|"" "Internet portal|
The term digital rights describes the "human rights that allow individuals to access, use, create, and publish "digital media or to access and use "computers, other "electronic devices, or "communications networks. The term is particularly related to the protection and realization of existing rights, such as the "right to privacy or "freedom of expression, in the context of new digital technologies, especially the "Internet. Internet access is recognized as a right by the laws of several countries.
A number of "human rights have been identified as relevant with regard to the "Internet. These include "freedom of expression, data protection and "privacy and "freedom of association. Furthermore, the "right to education and "multilingualism, "consumer rights, and capacity building in the context of the "right to development have also been identified.
With repressive regimes restricting access to information and communications, democratic governments should work to guarantee access to the Internet and adopt general principles to ensure network use respects universal human rights said an editorial in La Civilta Cattolica, a Jesuit journal reviewed by the Vatican before publication.
"What the law permits or prohibits offline must also be the case online," said the editorial released Nov. 17.
The "only widespread international consensus" on online material to be censored regards child pornography and cyberterrorism, the article said.
The Jesuit journal said that with individuals abusing the "freedom of expression, with companies potentially exploiting computer users for financial gain and repressive regimes blocking information from their citizens, the world needs a "Charter of Human Rights for the Internet".
The "Electronic Frontier Foundation has criticized the "United States government for considering during the "Megaupload seizure process that people lose "property rights by storing data on a cloud computing service.
Several countries have adopted laws that require the state to work to ensure that Internet access is broadly available and/or preventing the state from unreasonably restricting an individual's access to information and the Internet:
The APC Internet Rights Charter was established by the "Association for Progressive Communications (APC) at the APC Europe Internet Rights Workshop, held in Prague, February 2001. The Charter draws on the People's Communications Charter and develops seven themes: internet access for all; "freedom of expression and "association; access to knowledge, shared learning and creation - free and "open source software and technology development; "privacy, "surveillance and "encryption; "governance of the internet; awareness, protection and realization of rights. The APC states that "the ability to share information and communicate freely using the internet is vital to the realisation of human rights as enshrined in the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women."
In December 2003 the "World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was convened under the auspice of the "United Nations (UN). After lengthy negotiations between governments, businesses and civil society representatives the WSIS Declaration of Principles was adopted reaffirming "human rights:
"We reaffirm the universality, indivisibility, interdependence and interrelation of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the "right to development, as enshrined in the "Vienna Declaration. We also reaffirm that "democracy, "sustainable development, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms as well as good governance at all levels are interdependent and mutually reinforcing. We further resolve to strengthen the rule of law in international as in national affairs
"We reaffirm, as an essential foundation of the "Information Society, and as outlined in Article 19 of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that everyone has the right to "freedom of opinion and expression; that this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Communication is a fundamental social process, a basic human need and the foundation of all social organisation. It is central to the Information Society. Everyone, everywhere should have the opportunity to participate and no one should be excluded from the benefits of the Information Society offers."
The 2004 WSIS Declaration of Principles also acknowledged that "it is necessary to prevent the use of information resources and technologies for criminal and terrorist purposes, while respecting human rights." Wolfgang Benedek comments that the WSIS Declaration only contains a number of references to human rights and does not spell out any procedures or mechanism to assure that human rights are considered in practice.
In 2005, the United Kingdom's "Open Rights Group published a digital rights landscape, documenting the range of organizations and people active in the cause of preserving digital rights. The diagram related groups, individuals, and websites to interest areas.
The Dynamic Coalition for an Internet Bill of Rights held a large preparatory Dialogue Forum on Internet Rights in Rome, September 2007 and presented its ideas at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Rio in November 2007 leading to a joint declaration on internet rights.  At the IGF in Hyderabad in 2008 a merger between the Dynamic Coalitions on Human Rights for the Internet and on Principles for the Internet let to the Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights and Principles, which based on the APC Internet Rights Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights elaborated the Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet presented at the IGF in Vilnius in 2010 (www.internetrightsandprinciples.org), which since has been translated into several languages.
On October 29, 2008 the Global Network Initiative (GNI) was founded upon its "Principles on Freedom of Expression and Privacy". The Initiative was launched in the 60th Anniversary year of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and is based on internationally recognized laws and standards for "human rights on "freedom of expression and "privacy set out in the UDHR, the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Participants in the Initiative include the "Electronic Frontier Foundation, "Human Rights Watch, "Google, "Microsoft, "Yahoo, other major companies, human rights NGOs, investors, and academics.
According to reports "Cisco Systems was invited to the initial discussions but didn't take part in the initiative. Harrington Investments, which proposed that Cisco establish a human rights board, has dismissed the GNI as a voluntary code of conduct having any impact. Chief executive John Harrington called the GNI "meaningless noise" and instead calls for bylaws to be introduced that force boards of directors to accept human rights responsibilities.
A poll of 27,973 adults in 26 countries, including 14,306 Internet users, was conducted for the "BBC World Service by the international polling firm "GlobeScan using telephone and in-person interviews between 30 November 2009 and 7 February 2010. GlobeScan Chairman Doug Miller felt, overall, that the poll showed that:
Findings from the poll include:
The 88 recommendations made by the "Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in a May 2011 report to the "Human Rights Council of the "United Nations General Assembly include several that bear on the question of Internet access:
In July and August 2012 the "Internet Society conducted online interviews of more than 10,000 Internet users in 20 countries. Some of the results relevant to Digital rights and Internet access are summarized below.
|Question||No. of Responses||Responses|
|Access to the Internet should be considered a basic human right.||10,789||83% somewhat or strongly agree,
14% somewhat or strongly disagree,
3% don't know
|Each individual country has the right to govern the Internet the way they see fit.||10,789||67% somewhat or strongly agree,
29% somewhat or strongly disagree,
4% don't know /not applicable
|The Internet does more to help society than it does to hurt it.||10,789||83% somewhat or strongly agree,
13% somewhat or strongly disagree,
4% don't know / not applicable
|Increased government control of the Internet would make me use the Internet less.||9,717||57% somewhat or strongly agree,
39% somewhat or strongly disagree,
5% don't know / not applicable
|Increased government control of the Internet would increase the number of users.||9,717||40% somewhat or strongly agree,
52% somewhat or strongly disagree,
8% don't know / not applicable
|Governments need to place a higher priority on expanding the Internet and its benefits in my country.||10,789||83% somewhat or strongly agree,
11% somewhat or strongly disagree,
5% don't know / not applicable
|For the Internet to reach its full potential in my country people need to be able to access the Internet without data and content restrictions.||10,789||79% somewhat or strongly agree,
17% somewhat or strongly disagree,
4% don't know / not applicable
|"Library resources about