In "cryptography, the ElGamal encryption system is an "asymmetric key encryption algorithm for "public-key cryptography which is based on the "Diffie–Hellman key exchange. The system provides an additional layer of security by asymmetrically encrypting keys previously used for symmetric message encryption. It was described by "Taher Elgamal in 1985.^{[1]} ElGamal encryption is used in the free "GNU Privacy Guard software, recent versions of "PGP, and other "cryptosystems. The "Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) is a variant of the "ElGamal signature scheme, which should not be confused with ElGamal encryption.
ElGamal encryption can be defined over any "cyclic group . Its security depends upon the difficulty of a certain problem in related to computing "discrete logarithms (see below).
ElGamal encryption consists of three components: the key generator, the encryption algorithm, and the decryption algorithm.
The key generator works as follows:
The encryption algorithm works as follows: to encrypt a message to Alice under her public key ,
Note that one can easily find if one knows . Therefore, a new is generated for every message to improve security. For this reason, is also called an "ephemeral key.
The decryption algorithm works as follows: to decrypt a ciphertext with her private key ,
The ElGamal cryptosystem is usually used in a "hybrid cryptosystem. I.e., the message itself is encrypted using a symmetric cryptosystem and ElGamal is then used to encrypt the key used for the symmetric cryptosystem. This is because asymmetric cryptosystems like Elgamal are usually slower than symmetric ones for the same "level of security, so it is faster to encrypt the symmetric key (which most of the time is quite small if compared to the size of the message) with Elgamal and the message (which can be arbitrarily large) with a symmetric cipher.
The security of the ElGamal scheme depends on the properties of the underlying group as well as any padding scheme used on the messages.
If the "computational Diffie–Hellman assumption (CDH) holds in the underlying cyclic group , then the encryption function is "one-way.^{[2]}
If the "decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption (DDH) holds in , then ElGamal achieves "semantic security.^{[2]} Semantic security is not implied by the computational Diffie–Hellman assumption alone.^{[3]} See "decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption for a discussion of groups where the assumption is believed to hold.
ElGamal encryption is unconditionally "malleable, and therefore is not secure under "chosen ciphertext attack. For example, given an encryption of some (possibly unknown) message , one can easily construct a valid encryption of the message .
To achieve chosen-ciphertext security, the scheme must be further modified, or an appropriate padding scheme must be used. Depending on the modification, the DDH assumption may or may not be necessary.
Other schemes related to ElGamal which achieve security against chosen ciphertext attacks have also been proposed. The "Cramer–Shoup cryptosystem is secure under chosen ciphertext attack assuming DDH holds for . Its proof does not use the "random oracle model. Another proposed scheme is "DHAES,^{[3]} whose proof requires an assumption that is weaker than the DDH assumption.
ElGamal encryption is "probabilistic, meaning that a single "plaintext can be encrypted to many possible ciphertexts, with the consequence that a general ElGamal encryption produces a 2:1 expansion in size from plaintext to ciphertext.
Encryption under ElGamal requires two "exponentiations; however, these exponentiations are independent of the message and can be computed ahead of time if need be. Decryption only requires one exponentiation:
The division by can be avoided by using an alternative method for decryption. To decrypt a ciphertext with Alice's private key ,
is the inverse of . This is a consequence of "Lagrange's theorem, because