See more Eleatics articles on AOD.

Powered by
TTSReader
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia


( => ( => ( => Eleatics [pageid] => 591116 ) =>

The Eleatics were a "pre-Socratic school of "philosophy founded by "Parmenides in the early fifth century BC in the ancient town of "Elea. Other members of the school included "Zeno of Elea and "Melissus of Samos. "Xenophanes is sometimes included in the list, though there is some dispute over this. Elea, whose modern-day appellation is "Velia, was a "Greek colony located in present-day "Campania in southern "Italy.[1]

Contents

History[edit]

The school took its name from Elea ("Ancient Greek: Ἐλέα), a Greek city of lower Italy, the home of its chief exponents, Parmenides and Zeno. Its foundation is often attributed to "Xenophanes of "Colophon, but, although there is much in his speculations which formed part of the later Eleatic doctrine, it is probably more correct to regard Parmenides as the founder of the school.

Xenophanes espoused a belief that "God is one, supreme among gods and men, and not like mortals in body or in mind."[2] Parmenides developed some of Xenophanes's "metaphysical ideas. Subsequently, the school debated the possibility of "motion and other such fundamental questions. The work of the school was influential upon "Platonic metaphysics.

Philosophy[edit]

The Eleatics rejected the "epistemological validity of "sense experience, and instead took logical standards of clarity and necessity to be the criteria of "truth. Of the members, Parmenides and Melissus built arguments starting from sound premises. Zeno, on the other hand, primarily employed the "reductio ad absurdum, attempting to destroy the arguments of others by showing that their premises led to contradictions ("Zeno's paradoxes).

The main doctrines of the Eleatics were evolved in opposition to the theories of the early "physicalist philosophers, who explained all existence in terms of primary "matter, and to the theory of "Heraclitus, which declared that all existence may be summed up as perpetual change. The Eleatics maintained that the true explanation of things lies in the conception of a "universal unity of being. According to their doctrine, the "senses cannot cognize this unity, because their reports are inconsistent; it is by thought alone that we can pass beyond the false appearances of sense and arrive at the "knowledge of being, at the fundamental truth that the "All is One". Furthermore, there can be no "creation, for being cannot come from non-being, because a thing cannot arise from that which is different from it. They argued that errors on this point commonly arise from the ambiguous use of the verb to be, which may imply actual physical existence or be merely the linguistic "copula which connects "subject and "predicate.

Though the conclusions of the Eleatics were rejected by the later "Presocratics and "Aristotle, their arguments were taken seriously, and they are generally credited with improving the standards of discourse and argument in their time. Their influence was likewise long-lasting; "Gorgias, a "Sophist, argued in the style of the Eleatics in On Nature or What Is Not, and "Plato acknowledged them in the "Parmenides, the "Sophist and the "Statesman. Furthermore, much of the later philosophy of the ancient period borrowed from the methods and principles of the Eleatics.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Hugh Chrisholm, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11 ed.). Cambridge University Press. 
  2. ^ Zeller, Eduard. Vorsokrastische Philosophie (in German). p. 530, n.3. 
) )