While repeaters can isolate some aspects of "Ethernet segments, such as cable breakages, they still forward all traffic to all Ethernet devices. This creates practical limits on how many machines can communicate on an Ethernet network. The entire network is one "collision domain, and all hosts have to be able to detect collisions anywhere on the network. This limits the number of repeaters between the farthest nodes. Segments joined by repeaters have to all operate at the same speed, making phased-in upgrades impossible.
To alleviate these problems, bridging was created to communicate at the data link layer while isolating the physical layer. With bridging, only well-formed Ethernet packets are forwarded from one Ethernet segment to another; collisions and packet errors are isolated. At initial startup, Ethernet bridges (and switches) work somewhat like Ethernet repeaters, passing all traffic between segments. By observing the source addresses of incoming frames, the bridge then builds an address table associating addresses to segments. Once an address is learned, the bridge forwards network traffic destined for that address only to the associated segment, improving overall performance. "Broadcast traffic is still forwarded to all network segments. Bridges also overcome the limits on total segments between two hosts and allow the mixing of speeds, both of which are critical to deployment of "Fast Ethernet.
In 1989, the networking company "Kalpana (acquired by "Cisco Systems, Inc. in 1994) introduced their EtherSwitch, the first Ethernet switch.[h] This works somewhat differently from an Ethernet bridge, where only the header of the incoming packet is examined before it is either dropped or forwarded to another segment. This greatly reduces the forwarding latency and the processing load on the network device. One drawback of this "cut-through switching method is that packets that have been corrupted are still propagated through the network, so a jabbering station can continue to disrupt the entire network. The eventual remedy for this was a return to the original "store and forward approach of bridging, where the packet would be read into a buffer on the switch in its entirety, verified against its checksum and then forwarded, but using more powerful "application-specific integrated circuits. Hence, the bridging is then done in hardware, allowing packets to be forwarded at full wire speed.
When a twisted pair or fiber link segment is used and neither end is connected to a repeater, "full-duplex Ethernet becomes possible over that segment. In full-duplex mode, both devices can transmit and receive to and from each other at the same time, and there is no collision domain. This doubles the aggregate bandwidth of the link and is sometimes advertised as double the link speed (for example, 200 Mbit/s).[i] The elimination of the collision domain for these connections also means that all the link's bandwidth can be used by the two devices on that segment and that segment length is not limited by the need for correct collision detection.
Since packets are typically delivered only to the port they are intended for, traffic on a switched Ethernet is less public than on shared-medium Ethernet. Despite this, switched Ethernet should still be regarded as an insecure network technology, because it is easy to subvert switched Ethernet systems by means such as "ARP spoofing and "MAC flooding.
The bandwidth advantages, the improved isolation of devices from each other, the ability to easily mix different speeds of devices and the elimination of the chaining limits inherent in non-switched Ethernet have made switched Ethernet the dominant network technology.
Simple switched Ethernet networks, while a great improvement over repeater-based Ethernet, suffer from single points of failure, attacks that trick switches or hosts into sending data to a machine even if it is not intended for it, scalability and security issues with regard to "switching loops, "broadcast radiation and "multicast traffic, and bandwidth choke points where a lot of traffic is forced down a single link.["citation needed]
Advanced networking features in switches use "shortest path bridging (SPB) or the "spanning-tree protocol (STP) to maintain a loop-free, meshed network, allowing physical loops for redundancy (STP) or load-balancing (SPB). Advanced networking features also ensure port security, provide protection features such as "MAC lockdown and broadcast radiation filtering, use "virtual LANs to keep different classes of users separate while using the same physical infrastructure, employ "multilayer switching to route between different classes, and use "link aggregation to add bandwidth to overloaded links and to provide some redundancy.
"IEEE 802.1aq ("shortest path bridging) includes the use of the "link-state routing protocol "IS-IS to allow larger networks with shortest path routes between devices. In 2012, it was stated by David Allan and Nigel Bragg, in 802.1aq Shortest Path Bridging Design and Evolution: The Architect's Perspective that shortest path bridging is one of the most significant enhancements in Ethernet's history.
Ethernet has replaced "InfiniBand as the most popular system interconnect of "TOP500 supercomputers.
A node that is sending longer than the maximum transmission window for an Ethernet packet is considered to be jabbering. Depending on the physical topology, jabber detection and remedy differ somewhat.
- An "MAU is required to detect and stop abnormally long transmission from the "DTE (longer than 20–150 ms) in order to prevent permanent network disruption.
- On an electrically shared medium (10BASE5, 10BASE2, 1BASE5), jabber can only be detected by each end node, stopping reception. No further remedy is possible.
- A repeater/repeater hub uses a jabber timer that ends retransmission to the other ports when it expires. The timer runs for 40,000 to 75,000 bit times for 10 and 100 Mbit/s, 25,000 to 50,000 bit times for 1 Mbit/s, and 80,000 to 150,000 bit times for 1 Gbit/s. Jabbering ports are partitioned off the network until a carrier is no longer detected.
- End nodes utilizing a MAC layer will usually detect an oversized Ethernet frame and cease receiving. A bridge/switch will not forward the frame.
- A non-uniform frame size configuration in the network using "jumbo frames may be detected as jabber by end nodes.
- A packet detected as jabber by an upstream repeater and subsequently cut off has an invalid "frame check sequence and is dropped.
- "Runts are packets or frames smaller than the minimum allowed size. They are dropped and not propagated.
Varieties of Ethernet
The Ethernet physical layer evolved over a considerable time span and encompasses coaxial, twisted pair and fiber-optic physical media interfaces, with speeds from 10 Mbit/s to 100 Gbit/s, with "400 Gbit/s expected by 2018. The first introduction of twisted-pair CSMA/CD was "StarLAN, standardized as 802.3 1BASE5; while 1BASE5 had little market penetration, it defined the physical apparatus (wire, plug/jack, pin-out, and wiring plan) that would be carried over to 10BASE-T.
The most common forms used are "10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T. All three utilize twisted pair cables and "8P8C modular connectors. They run at 10 Mbit/s, 100 Mbit/s, and 1 Gbit/s, respectively. "Fiber optic variants of Ethernet are also very common in larger networks, offering high performance, better electrical isolation and longer distance (tens of kilometers with some versions). In general, network "protocol stack software will work similarly on all varieties.
In IEEE 802.3, a "datagram is called a packet or frame. Packet is used to describe the overall transmission unit and includes the "preamble, "start frame delimiter (SFD) and carrier extension (if present).[j] The frame begins after the start frame delimiter with a frame header featuring source and destination MAC addresses and "a field giving either the protocol type for the payload protocol or the length of the payload. The middle section of the frame consists of payload data including any headers for other protocols (for example, "Internet Protocol) carried in the frame. The frame ends with a 32-bit "cyclic redundancy check, which is used to detect corruption of "data in transit.:sections 3.1.1 and 3.2 Notably, Ethernet packets have no "time-to-live field, leading to possible problems in the presence of a "switching loop.
Autonegotiation is the procedure by which two connected devices choose common transmission parameters, e.g. speed and duplex mode. Autonegotiation is an optional feature, first introduced with 100BASE-TX, while it is also backward compatible with 10BASE-T. Autonegotiation is mandatory for 1000BASE-T.
- The experimental Ethernet described in the 1976 paper ran at 2.94 Mbit/s and has eight-bit destination and source address fields, so the original Ethernet addresses are not the "MAC addresses they are today. By software convention, the 16 bits after the destination and source address fields specify a "packet type", but, as the paper says, "different protocols use disjoint sets of packet types". Thus the original packet types could vary within each different protocol. This is in contrast to the "EtherType in the IEEE Ethernet standard, which specifies the protocol being used.
- In some cases, the factory-assigned address can be overridden, either to avoid an address change when an adapter is replaced or to use locally administered addresses.
- There are fundamental differences between wireless and wired shared-medium communication, such as the fact that it is much easier to detect collisions in a wired system than a wireless system.
- In a CSMA/CD system packets must be large enough to guarantee that the leading edge of the propagating wave of a message gets to all parts of the medium and back again before the transmitter stops transmitting, guaranteeing that "collisions (two or more packets initiated within a window of time that forced them to overlap) are discovered. As a result, the minimum packet size and the physical medium's total length are closely linked.
- Multipoint systems are also prone to strange failure modes when an electrical discontinuity reflects the signal in such a manner that some nodes would work properly, while others work slowly because of excessive retries or not at all. See "standing wave for an explanation. These could be much more difficult to diagnose than a complete failure of the segment.
- This "one speaks, all listen" property is a security weakness of shared-medium Ethernet, since a node on an Ethernet network can eavesdrop on all traffic on the wire if it so chooses.
- Unless it is put into "promiscuous mode.
- The term switch was invented by device manufacturers and does not appear in the 802.3 standard.
- This is misleading, as performance will double only if traffic patterns are symmetrical.
- The carrier extension is defined to assist collision detection on shared-media gigabit Ethernet.
- Ralph Santitoro (2003). "Metro Ethernet Services – A Technical Overview" (PDF). mef.net. Retrieved 2016-01-09.
- "IEEE 802.3 'Standard for Ethernet' Marks 30 Years of Innovation and Global Market Growth" (Press release). IEEE. June 24, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
- Xerox (August 1976). "Alto: A Personal Computer System Hardware Manual" (PDF). Xerox. p. 37. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
- Charles M. Kozierok (2005-09-20). "Data Link Layer (Layer 2)". tcpipguide.com. Retrieved 2016-01-09.
- Joe Jensen (2007-10-26). "802.11 g: Pros & Cons of a Wireless Network in a Business Environment". networkbits.net. Retrieved 2016-01-09.
- The History of Ethernet. NetEvents.tv. 2006. Retrieved September 10, 2011.
- "Ethernet Prototype Circuit Board". Smithsonian National Museum of American History. 1973. Retrieved September 2, 2007.
- Gerald W. Brock (September 25, 2003). The Second Information Revolution. Harvard University Press. p. 151. "ISBN "0-674-01178-3.
- Cade Metz (March 13, 2009). "Ethernet — a
networking protocolname for the ages: Michelson, Morley, and Metcalfe". The Register: 2. Retrieved March 4, 2013.
- Mary Bellis. "Inventors of the Modern Computer". About.com. Retrieved September 10, 2011.
- U.S. Patent 4,063,220 "Multipoint data communication system (with collision detection)"
- "Robert Metcalfe; "David Boggs (July 1976). "Ethernet: Distributed Packet Switching for Local Computer Networks" (PDF). "Communications of the ACM. 19 (7): 395–405. "doi:10.1145/360248.360253.
- "John F. Shoch; Yogen K. Dalal; David D. Redell; Ronald C. Crane (August 1982). "Evolution of the Ethernet Local Computer Network" (PDF). IEEE Computer. 15 (8): 14–26. "doi:10.1109/MC.1982.1654107.
- von Burg, Urs; Kenney, Martin (December 2003). "Sponsors, Communities, and Standards: Ethernet vs. Token Ring in the Local Area Networking Business" (PDF). Industry & Innovation. 10 (4): 351–375. "doi:10.1080/1366271032000163621. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 21, 2012. Retrieved 17 February 2014.
- Digital Equipment Corporation; Intel Corporation; Xerox Corporation (30 September 1980). "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network. Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specifications, Version 1.0" (PDF). Xerox Corporation. Retrieved 2011-12-10.
- Digital Equipment Corporation; Intel Corporation; Xerox Corporation (November 1982). "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network. Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specifications, Version 2.0" (PDF). Xerox Corporation. Retrieved 2011-12-10.
- Robert Breyer; Sean Riley (1999). Switched, Fast, and Gigabit Ethernet. Macmillan. "ISBN "1-57870-073-6.
- Jamie Parker Pearson (1992). Digital at Work. Digital Press. p. 163. "ISBN "1-55558-092-0.
- Rick Merritt (December 20, 2010). "Shifts, growth ahead for 10G Ethernet". E Times. Retrieved September 10, 2011.
- "My oh My – Ethernet Growth Continues to Soar; Surpasses Legacy". Telecom News Now. July 29, 2011. Retrieved September 10, 2011.
- Jim Duffy (February 22, 2010). "Cisco, Juniper, HP drive Ethernet switch market in Q4". Network World. Retrieved September 10, 2011.
- Vic Hayes (August 27, 2001). "Letter to FCC" (PDF). Retrieved October 22, 2010.
IEEE 802 has the basic charter to develop and maintain networking standards... IEEE 802 was formed in February 1980...
- IEEE 802.3-2008, p.iv
- "ISO 8802-3:1989". "ISO. Retrieved 2015-07-08.
- Jim Duffy (2009-04-20). "Evolution of Ethernet". "Network World. Retrieved 2016-01-01.
- "Douglas E. Comer (2000). Internetworking with TCP/IP – Principles, Protocols and Architecture (4th ed.). Prentice Hall. "ISBN "0-13-018380-6. 2.4.9 – Ethernet Hardware Addresses, p. 29, explains the filtering.
- Iljitsch van Beijnum. "Speed matters: how Ethernet went from 3Mbps to 100Gbps... and beyond". "Ars Technica. Retrieved July 15, 2011.
All aspects of Ethernet were changed: its MAC procedure, the bit encoding, the wiring... only the packet format has remained the same.
- Fast Ethernet Turtorial, Lantronix, retrieved 2016-01-01
- Geetaj Channana (November 1, 2004). "Motherboard Chipsets Roundup". PCQuest. Retrieved October 22, 2010.
While comparing motherboards in the last issue we found that all motherboards support Ethernet connection on board.
- Charles E. Spurgeon (2000). Ethernet: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly. "ISBN "978-1-56592-660-8.
- Heinz-Gerd Hegering; Alfred Lapple (1993). Ethernet: Building a Communications Infrastructure. Addison-Wesley. "ISBN "0-201-62405-2.
- Ethernet Tutorial – Part I: Networking Basics, Lantronix, retrieved 2016-01-01
- Shoch, John F.; Hupp, Jon A. (December 1980). "Measured performance of an Ethernet local network". Communications of the ACM. ACM Press. 23 (12): 711–721. "doi:10.1145/359038.359044. "ISSN 0001-0782.
- Boggs, D.R.; Mogul, J.C. & Kent, C.A. (September 1988). "Measured capacity of an Ethernet: myths and reality" (PDF). DEC WRL.
- Eric G. Rawson; Robert M. Metcalfe (July 1978). "Fibemet: Multimode Optical Fibers for Local Computer Networks" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Communications. 26 (7): 983–990. "doi:10.1109/TCOM.1978.1094189. Retrieved June 11, 2011.
- Spurgeon, Charles E. (2000). Ethernet; The Definitive Guide. Nutshell Handbook. O'Reilly. p. 29. "ISBN "1-56592-660-9.
- Urs von Burg (2001). The Triumph of Ethernet: technological communities and the battle for the LAN standard. Stanford University Press. p. 175. "ISBN "0-8047-4094-1.
- "Token Ring-to-Ethernet Migration". Cisco. Retrieved October 22, 2010.
Respondents were first asked about their current and planned desktop LAN attachment standards. The results were clear—switched Fast Ethernet is the dominant choice for desktop connectivity to the network
- Allan, David; Bragg, Nigel (2012). 802.1aq Shortest Path Bridging Design and Evolution : The Architects' Perspective. New York: Wiley. "ISBN "978-1-118-14866-2.
- "HIGHLIGHTS – JUNE 2016". June 2016. Retrieved 2016-08-08.
InfiniBand technology is now found on 205 systems, down from 235 systems, and is now the second most-used internal system interconnect technology. Gigabit Ethernet has risen to 218 systems up from 182 systems, in large part thanks to 176 systems now using 10G interfaces.
- IEEE 802.3 8.2 MAU functional specifications
- IEEE 802.3 22.214.171.124 Jabber function requirements
- IEEE 802.3 9.6.5 MAU Jabber Lockup Protection
- IEEE 802.3 126.96.36.199.4 Timers
- IEEE 802.3 188.8.131.52.3 Jabber function
- IEEE 802.3 184.108.40.206.4 Timers
- IEEE 802.3 220.127.116.11 Receive jabber functional requirements
- IEEE 802.1 Table C-1—Largest frame base values
- "Adopted Timeline" (PDF). IEEE 802.3bs Task Force. 2015-09-18. Retrieved 2017-01-08.
- "1BASE5 Medium Specification (StarLAN)". cs.nthu.edu.tw. 1996-12-28. Retrieved 2014-11-11.
- "802.3-2012 – IEEE Standard for Ethernet" (PDF). ieee.org. IEEE Standards Association. 2012-12-28. Retrieved 2014-02-08.
- Digital Equipment Corporation; Intel Corporation; Xerox Corporation (September 1980). "The Ethernet: A Local Area Network". ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 11 (3): 20. "doi:10.1145/1015591.1015594. Version 1.0 of the DIX specification.
- "Ethernet Technologies". Internetworking Technology Handbook. Cisco Systems. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
- Charles E. Spurgeon (2000). Ethernet: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly Media. "ISBN "978-1565-9266-08.
|""||Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ethernet.|