|"Applied and experimental|
Generative grammar is a "linguistic theory that regards "grammar as a system of rules that generates exactly those combinations of words that form grammatical sentences in a given "language. "Noam Chomsky first used the term in relation to the "theoretical linguistics of grammar that he developed in the late 1950s. Linguists who follow the generative approach have been called generativists. The generative school has focused on the study of "syntax, but has also addressed other aspects of a language's structure, including "morphology and "phonology.
Early versions of Chomsky's theory were called "transformational grammar, which is still used as a general term that includes his subsequent theories. The most recent is the "minimalist program, from which Chomsky and other generativists have argued that many of the properties of a generative grammar arise from a "universal grammar that is innate to the human brain, rather than being learned from the environment (see the "poverty of the stimulus argument).
There are a number of versions of generative grammar currently practiced within linguistics. A contrasting approach is that of "constraint-based grammars. Where a generative grammar attempts to list all the rules that result in all well-formed sentences, constraint-based grammars allow anything that is not otherwise constrained. Constraint-based grammars that have been proposed include certain versions of "dependency grammar, "head-driven phrase structure grammar, "lexical functional grammar, "categorial grammar, "relational grammar, "link grammar, and "tree-adjoining grammar. In "stochastic grammar, grammatical correctness is taken as a probabilistic variable, rather than a discrete (yes or no) property.
|This section needs additional citations for "verification. (July 2012) ("Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
There are a number of different approaches to generative grammar. Common to all is the effort to come up with a set of rules or principles that formally defines each and every one of the members of the set of well-formed expressions of a "natural language. The term generative grammar has been associated with at least the following schools of linguistics:
Although "Leonard Bloomfield, whose work Chomsky rejects, saw the ancient Indian grammarian Pāṇini as an antecedent of structuralism, Chomsky, in an award acceptance speech delivered in India in 2001, claimed "The first generative grammar in the modern sense was "Panini's grammar".
Generative grammar has been under development since the late 1950s, and has undergone many changes in the types of rules and representations that are used to predict grammaticality. In tracing the historical development of ideas within generative grammar, it is useful to refer to various stages in the development of the theory.
The so-called standard theory corresponds to the original model of generative grammar laid out by Chomsky in 1965.
A core aspect of standard theory is the distinction between two different representations of a sentence, called "deep structure and "surface structure. The two representations are linked to each other by "transformational grammar.
The so-called extended standard theory was formulated in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Features are:
The so-called revised extended standard theory was formulated between 1973 and 1976. It contains
An alternative model of syntax based on the idea that notions like subject, direct object, and indirect object play a primary role in grammar.
Chomsky's Lectures on Government and Binding (1981) and Barriers (1986).
|This section needs additional citations for "verification. (November 2008) ("Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Generative grammars can be described and compared, with the aid of the "Chomsky hierarchy (proposed by Chomsky) in the 1950s. This sets out a series of types of formal grammars with increasing expressive power. Among the simplest types are the "regular grammars (type 3); Chomsky claims that these are not adequate as models for human language, because of the allowance of the "center-embedding of strings within strings, in all natural human languages.
At a higher level of complexity are the "context-free grammars (type 2). The derivation of a sentence by such a grammar can be depicted as a derivation "tree. Linguists working within generative grammar often view such trees as a primary object of study. According to this view, a sentence is not merely a string of "words, but rather a hierarchy with subordinate and superordinate branches connected at nodes.
The resulting sentence could be The dog ate the bone. Such a tree diagram is also called a "phrase marker. They can be represented more conveniently in text form, (though the result is less easy to read); in this format the above sentence would be rendered as:
[S [NP [D The ] [N dog ] ] [VP [V ate ] [NP [D the ] [N bone ] ] ] ]
Generative grammar has been used to a limited extent in "music theory and "analysis since the 1980s. The most well-known approaches were developed by "Mark Steedman as well as "Fred Lerdahl and "Ray Jackendoff, who formalized and extended ideas from "Schenkerian analysis. More recently, such early generative approaches to music were further developed and extended by various scholars.The theory of generative grammar has been manipulated by the Sun Ra Revival Post-Krautrock Archestra in the development of their post-structuralist lyrics. This is particularly emphasised in their song "Sun Ra Meets Terry Lee".