Powered by
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia

Independent agencies of the "United States federal government are those "agencies that exist outside the "federal executive departments (those headed by a "Cabinet secretary) and the "Executive Office of the President.[1] In a more narrow sense, the term may also be used to describe agencies that, while constitutionally part of the "executive branch, are independent of presidential control, usually because the president's power to dismiss the agency head or a member is limited.["citation needed]

Established through separate "statutes passed by the "Congress, each respective "statutory grant of authority defines the goals the agency must work towards, as well as what substantive areas, if any, over which it may have the power of "rulemaking. These agency rules (or "regulations), when in force, have the power of federal law.["citation needed]


Functional characteristics[edit]

Independent agencies can be distinguished from the federal executive departments and other executive agencies by their structural and functional characteristics.[2] Congress can also designate certain agencies explicitly as "independent" in the governing statute, but the functional differences have more legal significance.[3]

While most executive agencies have a single director, administrator, or secretary appointed by the "President of the United States, independent agencies (in the narrower sense of being outside presidential control) almost always have a commission, board, or similar "collegial body consisting of five to seven members who share power over the agency.[2] (This is why many independent agencies include the word "Commission" or "Board" in their name.) The president appoints the "commissioners or "board members, subject to "Senate confirmation, but they often serve terms that are staggered and longer than a four-year presidential term,[4] meaning that most presidents will not have the opportunity to appoint all the commissioners of a given independent agency. The president can normally designate which commissioner will serve as the chairperson.[4] Normally there are statutory provisions limiting the president's authority to remove commissioners, typically for incapacity, "neglect of duty, "malfeasance, or other "good cause.[5] In addition, most independent agencies have a statutory requirement of "bipartisan membership on the commission, so the president cannot simply fill vacancies with members of his own political party.[4]

In reality, the high turnover rate among these commissioners or board members means that most presidents have the opportunity to fill enough vacancies to constitute a voting "majority on each independent agency commission within the first two years of the first term as president.[6] In some famous instances, presidents have found the independent agencies more loyal and in lockstep with the president's wishes and policy objectives than some dissenters among the "executive agency "political appointments.[7] Presidential attempts to remove independent agency officials have generated most of the important "Supreme Court legal opinions in this area.[4] Presidents normally do have the authority to remove heads of independent agencies, but they must meet the statutory requirements for removal, such as demonstrating that the individual has committed malfeasance. In contrast, the president can remove regular executive agency heads at will.

If the independent agency exercises any executive powers like enforcement, and most of them do, Congress cannot participate in the regular removal process of commissioners.[8] Constitutionally, Congress can only participate directly in "impeachment proceedings. Congress can, however, pass statutes limiting the circumstances under which the president can remove commissioners of independent agencies.[9] Members of Congress cannot serve as commissioners on independent agencies that have executive powers,[10] nor can Congress itself appoint the commissioners – the "Appointments Clause of the Constitution vests that power in the president.[11] The Senate does participate, however, in appointments through ""advice and consent", which occurs through confirmation hearings and votes on the president's nominees.

Regulatory agencies[edit]

There is a further distinction between an independent agency and an independent regulatory agency. The "Paperwork Reduction Act lists 19 enumerated "independent regulatory agencies". Generally, the heads of independent regulatory agencies can only be removed for cause, whereas Cabinet members and heads of executive agencies, such as the "Environmental Protection Agency, serve "at the pleasure of the president".[12] Executive Order 12866, which requires cost-benefit analysis for certain regulatory actions, does not apply to independent regulatory agencies.[12]

Examples of agencies[edit]

Former agencies[edit]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Breger, Marshall J.; Edles, Gary J. (2015). Independent Agencies in the United States: Law, Structure, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 6. "ISBN "9780199812127. 
  2. ^ a b Pierce, Richard; Shapiro, Sidney A.; Verkuil , Paul (5th ed. 2009), Administrative Law and Process, Section 4.4.1b, p. 101, Foundation Press "ISBN "1-59941-425-2
  3. ^ Shane,Peter, Merrill, Richard; Mashaw, Jerry (2003), Administrative Law: The American Public Law Process pp.228-29, Thomson-West: "ISBN "978-0-314-14425-6 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-07-16. Retrieved 2009-02-01. 
  4. ^ a b c d Pierce, Shapiro, & Verkuil (2009) p. 102.
  5. ^ See, e.g., "Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935).
  6. ^ Shane, Merrill, Mashaw (2003) p. 230; Pierce, Shapiro, & Verkuil (2009) p. 102.
  7. ^ Shane, Merrill, Mashaw (2003) p. 231.
  8. ^ See "Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986), "Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
  9. ^ "Humphrey's Executor v. United States 295 U.S. 602 (1935)
  10. ^ "Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
  11. ^ See "Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926); "Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
  12. ^ a b Copeland CW. (2013). Economic Analysis and Independent Regulatory Agencies. "Administrative Conference of the United States. See more at Benefit-Cost Analysis at Independent Regulatory Agencies.
  13. ^ Federal Maritime Commission
  14. ^ See, e.g., "Fed, central banks move to boost global confidence". AP. ["dead link]
  15. ^ See "About the NTSB". 
  16. ^ "49 U.S.C. § 1131
  17. ^ [ Richard H. Stallings Biography, Idaho State University Library]

External links[edit]

) ) WikipediaAudio is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the WikiMedia Foundation.