This article needs additional citations for "verification. (December 2016) ("Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Italian constitutional referendum|
|Do you approve the text of the Constitutional Law concerning 'Provisions for overcoming equal bicameralism, reducing the number of Members of Parliament, limiting the operating costs of the institutions, the suppression of the CNEL and the revision of Title V of Part II of the Constitution' approved by Parliament and published in the Official Gazette no. 88 of 15 April 2016?|
|Date||4 December 2016|
|On the map, the darker shades for a colour indicate a larger margin. Votes cast abroad are displayed in the bottom left for the four "overseas constituencies of Italian Parliament.|
A constitutional referendum was held in Italy on Sunday 4 December 2016. Voters were asked whether they approve a "constitutional law that amends the "Italian Constitution to reform the composition and powers of the "Parliament of Italy, as well as the division of powers between the State, the regions, and administrative entities.
The bill, put forward by then- "Prime Minister of Italy, "Matteo Renzi, and his centre-left "Democratic Party, was first introduced by the government in the Senate on 8 April 2014. After several amendments were made to the proposed law by both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, the bill received its first approval on 13 October 2015 (Senate) and 11 January 2016 (Chamber), and, eventually, its second and final approval on 20 January 2016 (Senate) and 12 April 2016 (Chamber).
In accordance with Article 138 of the Constitution, a referendum was called after the formal request of more than one fifth of the members of both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, since the constitutional law had not been approved by a qualified majority of two-thirds in each house of parliament in the second vote. 59.11% of voters voted against the constitutional reform, meaning it did not come into effect. This was the third constitutional referendum in the "history of the Italian Republic; the other two were in "2001 (in which the amending law was approved) and in "2006 (in which it was rejected).
Had the voters approved the constitutional law, it would have achieved the most extensive constitutional reform in Italy since the end of the "monarchy, not only influencing the organization of the Parliament, but also improving, according to its proponents, on the poor government stability of the country. Opposition parties and well-known "jurists (such as "Gustavo Zagrebelsky and "Stefano Rodotà) harshly criticised the bill, claiming that it was poorly written and would have made the government too powerful.
The "Italian Parliament is described as a perfectly symmetric bicameral legislature, in that it has a lower house (the "Chamber of Deputies) and an upper house (the "Senate of the Republic) with the following characteristics:
The first concrete attempts at reforming the Senate took place in the 1980s, when the first bicameral committee for constitutional reform headed by Aldo Bozzi was created (1983). A second bicameral committee (headed by "Ciriaco De Mita, later replaced by "Nilde Iotti) operated in 1992–1994, followed in 1997 by the third committee headed by the leader of the "Left Democrats, "Massimo D'Alema. These three attempts were completely unsuccessful.
A reform bill proposed by "Silvio Berlusconi's government was finally approved by the parliament in 2005. This proposal, which would also have considerably strengthened the powers of the Prime Minister, at the same time weakening the role of the President, was ultimately rejected in the "2006 referendum.
In 2011, with the "financial crisis ensuing and Berlusconi forced to resign from the position of Prime Minister, the Parliament reprised discussions on constitutional reforms at the urging of president "Giorgio Napolitano. However, strong disagreements between the two main parties (the "People of Freedom and the "Democratic Party) prevented the Parliament from deciding on a reform.
After the "2013 general election, constitutional reform remained a prominent political topic. However, the first real breakthrough occurred when "Matteo Renzi, the new Secretary of the Democratic Party, was appointed Prime Minister in February 2014. As part of his government's program, Renzi pledged to implement a number of reforms, including the abolition of the perfectly symmetric bicameralism, with a substantial decrease in the membership and power of the Senate. As well as effectively abolishing the current Senate, the package also included a "new electoral law, aimed at giving the party that won the most votes in elections for the Chamber of Deputies a great many additional seats, allowing the formation of a stronger government.
After the proposals passed both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate twice, as required by Article 138 of the Italian constitution, Renzi announced that he would hold a referendum to secure the endorsement of the Italian people for the change. In January 2016, announcing an October date for the referendum, Matteo Renzi stated that if his reforms were rejected he would resign as Prime Minister and leave politics. Some opposition parties, predominantly "Five Star Movement, "Lega Nord and "Italian Left, and also some newspapers like "Il Fatto Quotidiano and "Il manifesto, accused Renzi of turning the referendum into a plebiscite on his premiership with those comments. However, after some months, Renzi said that his government will continue until the end of the legislature.
On 15 January 2016, "La Repubblica announced that Renzi had hired American political adviser "Jim Messina – who had worked with "Barack Obama and "David Cameron and would later work for "Mariano Rajoy – to oversee the campaign for "Yes".
The Senate represents territorial institutions. It shares the legislative power with the Chamber of Deputies, but the vote of the Senate is only required to enact laws regarding specific matters. For all other laws, the vote of the Senate is optional and can be overruled by a second vote of the Chamber of Deputies.
The Government does not need to have the confidence of the new Senate, and the Senate cannot pass a motion of no confidence against the Government.
The Senate is not subject to dissolution; instead, when a Regional Council ends its five years term, so do the senators elected by it; new senators will be elected after the Regional Council is renewed.
The reform differentiates between two main legislative procedures: a unicameral procedure (in which the role of the Senate is mostly consultative) and a bicameral procedure (in which a bill must be approved by both Chambers).
Under the unicameral procedure (which is used every time the Constitution does not require a special procedure), bills can be adopted by a vote of the Chamber of Deputies. At that point, the approved bill is sent to the Senate, which has 10 days to decide whether to examine it to propose changes, or let it be enacted without modification. If one-third of the senators ask to review the bill, the Senate has 30 days to formulate amendments and send the bill back to the Chamber of Deputies. Then the deputies will take the final decision on the Senate's proposals and on the bill as a whole. No further approval of the Senate is needed, but a qualified majority might be required to overcome the Senate's veto for laws adopted under the supremacy clause.
The bicameral procedure works in a similar way to the current legislative procedure, in that bills must be approved in the same text by both houses to be enacted, and will be forwarded from one house to the other until approved by both. This procedure is required for bills regarding the following.
The reform draws a different partition of matters reserved to the State and to the regions. The so-called "concurrent competence", according to which State law legislates the principles that are later to be implemented by regional laws, is abolished. All concurrent matters are reassigned to either the State's or the regions' competence.
The Government can propose legislation to the Parliament on matters that are not reserved to the State, when this is required to protect the juridical or economic unity of Italy, or to protect national interests. Such laws are adopted according to the unicameral legislative procedure: however, when modifications are proposed by an absolute majority of the members of the Senate, the Chamber of Deputies can override the proposals only by voting against them with an absolute majority of its members.
The "National Council for Economics and Labour (CNEL), which is a consultative assembly of experts of the economic, social, and legal fields, representatives of public and private-sector producers of goods and services, and representatives of social service and voluntary organisations, is abolished.
"Provinces (the second-level "administrative divisions of Italy) are removed from the Constitution, except for the autonomous provinces of "Bolzano and "Trento. This opens the door for ordinary laws to abolish or radically reform them. In 2014–15 fourteen provinces were already replaced by ""metropolitan cities" (that still exist in the reformed Constitution).
Prime Minister Renzi was accused by some law scholars and politicians, such as "Stefano Rodotà and "Fausto Bertinotti, of being authoritarian and anti-democratic for proposing this reform. Others, like "Gianfranco Pasquino, argue that the adopted text is badly written.
In April 2016, a paper called "Appello dei costituzionalisti" ("A Plea from Constitutional Scholars") was written by 56 law scholars (mainly constitutional law scholars), showing criticism of the proposed reform and their numerous concerns: among them are Francesco Amirante, Paolo Caretti, Lorenza Carlassare, Ugo De Siervo, "Giovanni Maria Flick, Paolo Maddalena, Valerio Onida, Alfonso Quaranta and "Gustavo Zagrebelsky. The main points of criticism the paper raises are the following:
Later, in May 2016, other 184 law scholars and professors of various disciplines (among whom "Franco Bassanini, Massimo Bordignon, Stefano Ceccanti, Francesco Clementi, Carlo Fusaro, Claudia Mancina, Stefano Mannoni, Angelo Panebianco, Pasquale Pasquino, Francesco Pizzetti, Michele Salvati, Tiziano Treu) signed, instead, an appeal in favour of the constitutional reform.
|Yes||"Democratic Party (PD)||"Social democracy||"Matteo Renzi|||
|"New Centre-Right (NCD)||"Conservatism||"Angelino Alfano|||
|"Liberal Popular Alliance (ALA)||"Centrism||"Denis Verdini|||
|"Civic Choice (SC)||"Liberalism||"Enrico Zanetti|||
|No||"Five Star Movement (M5S)||"Populism||"Beppe Grillo|||
|"Forza Italia (FI)||"Liberal conservatism||"Silvio Berlusconi|||
|"Italian Left (SI)||"Democratic socialism||"Nicola Fratoianni|||
|"Lega Nord (LN)||"Populism||"Matteo Salvini|||
|"Brothers of Italy (FdI)||"National conservatism||"Giorgia Meloni|||
|"Conservatives and Reformists (CR)||"Conservatism||"Raffaele Fitto|||
|Yes||"Party of European Socialists (PES)||"Social democracy||"Sergei Stanishev|||
|No||"Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM 25)||"Alter-Europeanism||"Yanis Varoufakis|||
|Choice||Organisations||Political and cultural orientation||Secretaries|
|Yes||"General Confederation of Italian Industry (Confindustria)||"Employers and businesses' organisation||Vincenzo Boccia|
|"Italian Confederation of Workers' Trade Unions (CISL)||"Centrism||Anna Maria Furlan|
|No||"Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL)||"Democratic socialism||"Susanna Camusso|
|Neutral/Undeclared||"Italian Labour Union (UIL)||"Social democracy||Carmelo Barbagallo|
|Choice||Newspapers||Political and cultural orientation|
|"Il Sole 24 Ore||"Business "newspaper|
|"Il Foglio||"Liberal conservatism|
|No||"Il Fatto Quotidiano||"Anti-establishment, "Populism|
|Neutral/Undeclared||"La Repubblica||"Social liberalism|
|"Corriere della Sera||"Centrism|
|Choice||Periodicals||Political and cultural orientation|
|Yes||"La Civiltà Cattolica||Periodical published by the "Society of Jesus|
|"Mondoperaio||Monthly journal, official organ of the "Italian Socialist Party|
|Choice||Organisations||Political and cultural orientation||Leaders|
|Yes||"Christian Associations of Italian Workers (ACLI)||"Catholic social teaching, "Christian left||Roberto Rossini|
|No||"National Association of the Italian Partisans (ANPI)||"Anti-fascism||Carlo Smuraglia|
|16 September||"La7||Sì o No||"Enrico Mentana||"Roberto Giachetti||"Massimo D'Alema||792,000||3.4%|||
|23 September||"Gian Luca Galletti,
|30 September||"Matteo Renzi||"Gustavo Zagrebelsky||1,747,000||8.0%|||
|14 October||"Luciano Violante||Tomaso Montanari||626,000||3.8%|||
|23 September||"La7||Otto e Mezzo||"Lilli Gruber||"Matteo Renzi||"Marco Travaglio||2,280,000||9.4%|||
|7 October||"Maria Elena Boschi||"Matteo Salvini||2,000,000||8.4%|||
|28 October||"La7||Sì o No||"Enrico Mentana||"Matteo Renzi||"Ciriaco De Mita||825,000||10.8%|
|4 November||Stefano Ceccanti
"Almost nineteen million five hundred thousand voters rejected the reform (fifty-nine point eleven per cent), while nearly thirteen million five hundred thousand voters approved it (forty point eighty-eight per cent). The turnout (sixty-five point forty-seven per cent) was by far the highest compared to Italy’s other constitutional referendums: "in 2001, the voter turnout was extremely low (thirty-four point ten per cent); "in 2006 it was higher, but barely exceeded half of the total number of eligible voters (fifty-two point forty-six per cent)".
|Ministry of the Interior|
"Sardinia and "South Tyrol, both constituent entities of the Italian Republic with "special conditions of autonomy, reported overall the highest percentage of No and Yes votes respectively.
|North and Central Americas||62,816||62.2||38,113||37.8||15,979||13.6||374,987||31.2|
|Africa, Asia, Oceania, Antarctica||37,644||59.7||25,433||40.3||7,201||10.2||220,252||31.9|
After the first exit polls, Prime Minister Matteo Renzi announced in a midnight press conference that he would resign the next day. In his speech, Renzi assumed full responsibility for the referendum defeat.
The President of the Italian Republic "Sergio Mattarella asked Matteo Renzi to briefly postpone his resignation, in order to complete the parliamentary approval of the next year's budget law. After the budget was passed on 7 December, Renzi resigned that night.
Financial markets were not been particularly affected by the defeat the constitutional reform: the "Milan stock exchange closed the Monday session on stable (−0.2% on respect of previous Friday closing, before the vote), while on Tuesday 6 December the stock index jumped at +4.15% (best result since 11 March 2016).
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Italian constitutional referendum, 2016.|