See more Jain philosophy articles on AOD.

Powered by
TTSReader
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia


( => ( => ( => Jain philosophy [pageid] => 14298096 ) =>

Jain philosophy is the oldest Indian philosophy that separates body (matter) from the soul (consciousness) completely.[1] Jain philosophy deals with "reality, "cosmology, "epistemology (study of knowledge) and Vitalism. The concept of non-injury or "ahiṃsā lies at the core of Jain philosophy. Jain philosophy attempts to explain the rationale of being and existence, the nature of the Universe and its constituents, the nature of bondage and the means to achieve liberation.

Jain texts expound that in every half-cycle of time, twenty-four "tirthankaras grace this part of the Universe to teach the unchanging doctrine of right faith, right knowledge and right conduct.[2][3] Jain philosophy means the teachings of a Tirthankara which are recorded in "Sacred Jain texts. The distinguishing features of Jain philosophy are:-["citation needed]

Jainism strongly upholds the individualistic nature of soul and personal responsibility for one's decisions; and that self-reliance and individual efforts alone are responsible for one's liberation.["citation needed]

Contents

Ahiṃsā[edit]

According to the Jain texts, the vitalities or life-principles are ten, namely the five senses, energy, respiration, life-duration, the organ of speech, and the mind. The table below summaries the vitalities, living beings possess in accordance to their senses.[4]

Senses Number of vitalities Vitalities
One
Four Sense organ of touch, strength of body or energy, respiration, and life-duration
Two
Six The sense of taste and the organ of speech in addition to the former four
Three
Seven The sense of smell in addition to the former six
Four
Eight The sense of sight in addition to the former seven
Five
sensed beings
Nine The sense of hearing in addition to the former eight
Ten Mind in addition to the above-mentioned nine vitalities

In the animal world, the five-sensed beings without mind have nine life-principles with the addition of the sense of hearing. Those endowed with mind have ten with the addition of the mind.[5] According to "Tattvarthasutra, a major Jain text, "the severance of vitalities out of passion is injury".[6] According to the "Purushartha Siddhyupaya, "non-manifestation of passions like attachment is non-injury (ahiṃsā), and manifestation of such passions is injury (hiṃsā)." This is termed as the essence of the Jaina Scriptures.[7] "Vegetarianism and other nonviolent practices and rituals of Jains flow from the principle of ahiṃsā.[8]

Fundamentals[edit]

Jain philosophy postulates that seven "tattva" (truths or fundamental principles) constitute reality.[9] These are:[10]-

  1. Jīva-The "soul substance which is said to have a separate existence from the body that houses it. Jīva is characterised by cetana (consciousness) and upayoga (knowledge and perception). Though the soul experiences both birth and death, it is neither really destroyed nor created. Decay and origin refer respectively to the disappearing of one state of soul and appearance of another state, these being merely the modes of the soul substance.
  2. "ajīva- the non-soul
  3. "āsrava (influx)- inflow of auspicious and evil karmic matter into the soul.
  4. "bandha (bondage)- mutual intermingling of the soul and karmas.
  5. "Samvara (stoppage)- obstruction of the inflow of karmic matter into the soul.
  6. "Nirjara (gradual dissociation)- separation or falling off of part of karmic matter from the soul.
  7. mokṣha (liberation)- complete annihilation of all karmic matter (bound with any particular soul).

The knowledge of these reals is said to be essential for the liberation of the soul.["citation needed]

The Path to Liberation[edit]

According to the Jain philosophy, the world ("Saṃsāra) is full of hiṃsā (violence). Therefore, one should direct all his efforts in attainment of moksha. According to the "Jain text, "Tattvartha sutra:

Right faith, right knowledge, and right conduct (together) constitute the path to liberation.

— Tattvārthasūtra (1–1)[11]

Gunasthāna[edit]

""
""
Fourteen stages on the path to liberation

Jain text mention about the following stages of spiritual development:[15][16][17]

Head Gunasthāna Meaning
Belief
(Rationality
in perception)
1. Mithyātva The stage of wrong believer (Gross ignorance)
2. Sasādana Downfall from right faith
3. Misradrsti Mixed right and wrong belief
4. Avirata samyagdrsti Vowless right belief
Minor Vows
(Commencement
of Right conduct)
5. Deśavirata The stage of partial self-control
Right conduct:
"Mahavratas (Major Vows)
6. Pramattasamyata Slightly imperfect vows
7. Apramatta samyata Perfect vows
8. Apūrvakaraņa New thought-activity
9. Anivāttibādara-sāmparāya Advanced thought-activity (Passions are still occurring)
10.Sukshma samparaya Slightest delusion
11.Upaśānta-kasāya Subsided delusion
12.Ksīna kasāya Destroyed delusion
13.Sayoga kevali Omniscience with vibration
14.Ayoga kevali The stage of omniscience without any activity

Those who pass the last stage are called siddha and become fully established in Right Faith, Right Knowledge and Right Conduct.[18]

Substances[edit]

According to Jainas, the world is composed of two different kinds of substances, the Jīva (conscious) and the ajīva (unconscious). These are the uncreated existing constituents of the Universe which impart the necessary dynamics to the Universe by interacting with each other. These constituents behave according to the natural laws and their nature without interference from external entities. Dharma or true religion according to Jainism is Vatthu sahāvō dhammō translated as "the intrinsic nature of a substance is its true "dharma."[19]

Unconscious substance[edit]

The five unconscious (ajīva) substances are:[20]

Conscious substance[edit]

According to the Jain philosophy, there are infinite independent souls. These are categorised into two—liberated and non-liberated. Infinite knowledge, perception and bliss are the intrinsic qualities of a soul.[23] These qualities are fully enjoyed unhindered by liberated souls, but obscured by "karma in the case of non-liberated souls resulting in karmic bondage. This bondage further results in a continuous co-habitation of the soul with the body. Thus, an embodied non-liberated soul is found in four realms of existence—heavens, hells, humans and animal world – in a never-ending cycle of births and deaths also known as "samsāra. The soul is in bondage since beginningless time; however, it is possible to achieve liberation through rational perception, rational knowledge and rational conduct. Harry Oldmeadow notes that Jain ontology is both "realist and "dualist metaphysics.[24]

Karma[edit]

""
""
Karma as "action and reaction: if we sow "goodness, we will reap goodness.
""
""
Classification of karmas as mentioned in Jain texts

In Jainism, karma is the basic principle within an overarching psycho-cosmology. It not only encompasses the causality of transmigration, but is also conceived of as an extremely subtle matter, which infiltrates the soul—obscuring its natural, transparent and pure qualities. Karma is thought of as a kind of pollution, that taints the soul with various colours (leśyā).[25] Based on its karma, a soul undergoes transmigration and reincarnates in various states of existence—like heavens or hells, or as humans or animals.[26]

Jains cite inequalities, sufferings, and pain as evidence for the existence of karma. Jain texts have classified the various types of karma according to their effects on the potency of the soul. The Jain theory seeks to explain the karmic process by specifying the various causes of karmic influx (āsrava) and bondage (bandha), placing equal emphasis on deeds themselves, and the intentions behind those deeds.[27]["incomplete short citation] The Jain karmic theory attaches great responsibility to individual actions, and eliminates reliance on supposed existence of divine grace or retribution.[28] The Jain doctrine also holds that it is possible for us to both modify our karma, and to obtain release from it, through the austerities and purity of conduct.[26]

Cosmology[edit]

"Jain cosmology denies the existence of a supreme being responsible for creation and operation of universe. According to "Jainism, this loka or Universe is an uncreated entity, existing since infinity, immutable in nature, beginningless and endless. "Jain texts describe the shape of the Universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on his waist. The Universe according to Jainism is narrow at top and broad at middle and once again becomes narrow at the bottom. "Mahāpurāṇa of Ācārya "Jinasena is famous for his quote:[29]["incomplete short citation]

Some foolish men declare that the creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If god created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could god have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression.

Kalchakra[edit]

""
""
Division of time as envisaged by Jains.

According to Jainism, time is beginningless and eternal. The Kālacakra, the cosmic wheel of time, rotates ceaselessly.[30] The wheel of time is divided into two half-rotations, Utsarpiṇī or ascending time cycle and Avasarpiṇī, the descending time cycle, occurring continuously after each other. Utsarpiṇī is a period of progressive prosperity and happiness, while Avsarpiṇī is a period of increasing sorrow and immorality. Each of this half time cycle consisting of innumerable period of time (measured in Sagaropama and Palyopama years) is further sub-divided into six aras or epochs of unequal periods. Currently, the time cycle is in avasarpiṇī or descending phase with the following epochs.[31] The aras defined in Jain texts are:

In utsarpiṇī the order of the aras is reversed. Starting from Duḥṣama- duḥṣamā, it ends with Suṣama-suṣamā and thus this never ending cycle continues.[32] Each of these aras progress into the next phase seamlessly without apocalyptic consequences. The increase or decrease in the happiness, life spans and length of people and general moral conduct of the society changes in a phased and graded manner as the time passes. No divine or supernatural beings are credited or responsible with these spontaneous temporal changes, either in a creative or overseeing role, rather human beings and creatures are born under the impulse of their own "karma.[33]

Loka[edit]

""
""
Structure of Universe according to the Jain scriptures.

The early Jains contemplated the nature of the earth and universe and developed a detailed hypothesis on the various aspects of astronomy and cosmology. According to the Jain texts, the universe is divided into 3 parts:[34]

Śalākāpuruṣas[edit]

During the each motion of the half-cycle of the wheel of time, 63 Śalākāpuruṣa or 63 illustrious men, consisting of the 24 Tīrthaṅkaras and their contemporaries regularly appear. The Jain universal or legendary history is basically a compilation of the deeds of these illustrious men. They are 24 Tīrthaṅkara, 12 Chakravartī, 9 Baladevas, 9 Vāsudevas and 9 Prativāsudevas. Besides these there are 9 Narada, 11 Rudras, 24 Kamdeva, 24 Fathers of the Tirthankaras, 24 Mothers of the Tirthankaras and 14 patriarchs (Kulakara) who are also important figures in Jain universal history.[36]

Epistemology[edit]

Jainism made its own unique contribution to this mainstream development of philosophy by occupying itself with the basic "epistemological issues, namely, with those concerning the nature of knowledge, how knowledge is derived, and in what way knowledge can be said to be reliable. Knowledge for the Jains takes place in the soul, which, without the limiting factor of karma, is omniscient. Humans have partial knowledge – the object of knowledge is known partially and the means of knowledge do not operate to their full capacity. According to "Tattvārthasūtra, the knowledge of the basic Jaina truths can be obtained through:["citation needed]

Pramāṇa are of five kinds:[37]

The first two are described as being indirect means of knowledge (parokṣa), with the others furnishing direct knowledge (pratyakṣa), by which it is meant that the object is known directly by the soul. Jains came out with their doctrines of "relativity used for logic and reasoning:

These philosophical concepts have made most important contributions to the ancient "Indian philosophy, especially in the areas of scepticism and relativity.[38]

Anekāntavāda[edit]

""
""
Aspects of Violence (Himsa)

One of the most important and fundamental doctrines of Jainism is "Anēkāntavāda. It refers to the principles of "pluralism and multiplicity of viewpoints, the notion that truth and reality are perceived differently from diverse points of view, and that no single point of view is the complete truth.[39][40][41]

Jains contrast all attempts to proclaim absolute truth with andhagajanyāyah, which can be illustrated through the parable of the ""blind men and an elephant". In this story, each blind man felt a different part of an elephant (trunk, leg, ear, etc.). All the men claimed to understand and explain the true appearance of the elephant, but could only partly succeed, due to their limited perspectives.[42] This principle is more formally stated by observing that objects are infinite in their qualities and modes of existence, so they cannot be completely grasped in all aspects and manifestations by finite human perception. According to the Jains, only the "Kevalis—omniscient beings—can comprehend objects in all aspects and manifestations; others are only capable of partial knowledge.[43] According to the doctrine, no single, specific, human view can claim to represent "absolute truth.[39]

Anekāntavāda encourages its adherents to consider the views and beliefs of their rivals and opposing parties. Proponents of anekāntavāda apply this principle to religion and philosophy, reminding themselves that any religion or philosophy—even Jainism—which clings too dogmatically to its own tenets, is committing an error based on its limited point of view.[44] The principle of anekāntavāda also influenced "Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to adopt principles of religious tolerance, ahiṃsā and "satyagraha.[45]

Syādvāda[edit]

"Syādvāda is the theory of "conditioned "predication, which provides an expression to anekānta by recommending that the epithet Syād be prefixed to every phrase or expression.[46] Syādvāda is not only an extension of anekānta "ontology, but a separate system of logic capable of standing on its own. The Sanskrit etymological root of the term syād is "perhaps" or "maybe", but in the context of syādvāda, it means "in some ways" or "from a perspective". As reality is complex, no single proposition can express the nature of reality fully. Thus the term "syāt" should be prefixed before each proposition giving it a conditional point of view and thus removing any dogmatism in the statement.[40] Since it ensures that each statement is expressed from seven different conditional and relative viewpoints or propositions, syādvāda is known as saptibhaṅgīnāya or the theory of seven conditioned predications. These seven propositions, also known as "saptibhaṅgī, are:[47]

  1. syād-asti—in some ways, it is,
  2. syād-nāsti—in some ways, it is not,
  3. syād-asti-nāsti—in some ways, it is, and it is not,
  4. syād-asti-avaktavyaḥ—in some ways, it is, and it is indescribable,
  5. syād-nāsti-avaktavyaḥ—in some ways, it is not, and it is indescribable,
  6. syād-asti-nāsti-avaktavyaḥ—in some ways, it is, it is not, and it is indescribable,
  7. syād-avaktavyaḥ—in some ways, it is indescribable.

Each of these seven propositions examines the complex and multifaceted nature of reality from a relative point of view of time, space, substance and mode.[47] To ignore the complexity of reality is to commit the fallacy of "dogmatism.[40]

Nayavāda[edit]

Nayavāda is the theory of partial standpoints or viewpoints. Nayavāda is a compound of two "Sanskrit words—naya ("partial viewpoint") and vāda (""school of thought or debate").[48] It is used to arrive at a certain "inference from a point of view. An object has infinite aspects to it, but when we describe an object in practice, we speak of only relevant aspects and ignore irrelevant ones.[48] This does not deny the other attributes, qualities, modes and other aspects; they are just irrelevant from a particular perspective. As a type of "critical philosophy, nayavāda holds that all philosophical disputes arise out of confusion of standpoints, and the standpoints we adopt are, although we may not realise it, "the outcome of purposes that we may pursue".[49] While operating within the limits of language and seeing the complex nature of reality, Māhavīra used the language of nayas. Naya, being a partial expression of truth, enables us to comprehend reality part by part.[50]

Ethics[edit]

The Jain morality and ethics are rooted in its metaphysics and its utility towards the soteriological objective of liberation. Jaina ethics evolved out of the rules for the ascetics which are encapsulated in the "mahavratas or the five great vows.["citation needed]

Head Vow Meaning
Five vows
1. "Ahiṃsā Not to hurt any living being by actions and thoughts
2. "Satya Not to lie or speak what is not commendable.[51]
3. "Asteya Not to take anything if not given.[52]
4. "Brahmacharya Chastity / Celibacy in action, words & thoughts
5. "Aparigraha ("Non-possession) Detachment from material property.
Guņa vratas[53]
6. digvrata Restriction on movement with regard to directions.
7. bhogopabhogaparimana Vow of limiting consumable and non-consumable things
8. anartha-dandaviramana Refraining from harmful occupations and activities (purposeless sins).
Śikşā vratas[53]
9. "samayika Vow to meditate and concentrate periodically.
10.desavrata Limiting movement to certain places for a fixed period of time.[54]
11.upvas Fasting at regular intervals.
12.atihti samvibhag Vow of offering food to the ascetic and needy people

These ethics are governed not only through the instrumentality of physical actions, but also through verbal action and thoughts. Thus, ahimsa has to be observed through mind, speech, and body. The other rules of the ascetics and laity are derived from these five major vows.["citation needed]

Jainism does not invoke fear of or reverence for God or conformity to the divine character as a reason for moral behaviour, and observance of the moral code is not necessary simply because it is God's will. Neither is its observance necessary simply because it is altruistic or humanistic, conducive to general welfare of the state or the community. Rather it is an "egoistic imperative aimed at self-liberation. While it is true that in Jainism, the moral and religious injunctions were laid down as law by "Arihants who have achieved perfection through their supreme moral efforts, their adherence is just not to please a God, but because the life of the Arihants has demonstrated that such commandments were conducive to the Arihant's own welfare, helping them to reach spiritual victory. Just as the Arihants achieved "moksha or liberation by observing the moral code, so can anyone, who follows this path.["citation needed]

Science and Mathematics[edit]

Atomism[edit]

The most elaborate and well-preserved Indian theory of "atomism comes from the philosophy of the "Jaina school, dating back to at least the 6th century BC. Some of the Jain texts that refer to matter and atoms are "Pancastikayasara, "Kalpasutra, "Tattvarthasutra and Pannavana Suttam. The Jains envisioned the world as consisting wholly of atoms, except for souls. Paramāņus or atoms were the basic building blocks of matter. Their concept of atoms was very similar to classical atomism, differing primarily in the specific properties of atoms. Each atom, according to Jain philosophy, has one kind of taste, one smell, one color, and two kinds of touch, though it is unclear what was meant by "kind of touch". Atoms can exist in one of two states: subtle, in which case they can fit in infinitesimally small spaces, and gross, in which case they have extension and occupy a finite space. Certain characteristics of Paramāņu correspond with that of sub-atomic particles. For example, Paramāņu is characterized by continuous motion either in a straight line or in case of attractions from other Paramāņus, it follows a curved path. This corresponds with the description of orbit of electrons across the Nucleus. Ultimate particles are also described as particles with positive (Snigdha i.e. smooth charge) and negative (Rūksa – rough) charges that provide them the binding force. Although atoms are made of the same basic substance, they can combine based on their eternal properties to produce any of six "aggregates", which seem to correspond with the Greek concept of "elements": earth, water, shadow, sense objects, karmic matter, and unfit matter. To the Jains, karma was real, but was a naturalistic, mechanistic phenomenon caused by buildups of subtle karmic matter within the soul. They also had detailed theories of how atoms could combine, react, vibrate, move, and perform other actions, which were thoroughly deterministic.["citation needed]

Infinity[edit]

""
""
Illustrated pages from manuscript of Suryaprajnapati Sutra

The "Jain mathematical text Surya Prajnapti (c. 400 BC) classifies numbers into three sets: enumerable, innumerable, and infinite. Each of these was further subdivided into three orders:["citation needed]

The Jains were the first to discard the idea that all infinites were the same or equal. They recognized different types of infinities: infinite in length (one "dimension), infinite in area (two dimensions), infinite in volume (three dimensions), and infinite perpetually (infinite number of dimensions).["citation needed]

According to Singh (1987), Joseph (2000) and Agrawal (2000), the highest enumerable number N of the Jains corresponds to the modern concept of "aleph-null (the "cardinal number of the infinite set of integers 1, 2, ...), the smallest cardinal "transfinite number. The Jains also defined a whole system of infinite cardinal numbers, of which the highest enumerable number N is the smallest.["citation needed]

In the Jaina work on the "theory of sets, two basic types of infinite numbers are distinguished. On both physical and "ontological grounds, a distinction was made between asaṃkhyāta ("countless, innumerable") and ananta ("endless, unlimited"), between rigidly bounded and loosely bounded infinities.["citation needed]

Contributions to Indian philosophy[edit]

Jainism had a major influence in developing a system of philosophy and ethics that had a major impact on "Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. The scholarly research and evidences have shown that philosophical concepts that are typically Indian – "Karma, "Ahimsa, "Moksa, reincarnation and like – either have their origins in the "shramana traditions or were propagated and developed by Jain teachers. The sramanic ideal of mendicancy and renunciation, that the worldly life was full of suffering and that emancipation required giving up of desires and withdrawal into a lonely and contemplative life, was in stark contrast with the brahmanical ideal of an active and ritually punctuated life based on sacrifices, household duties and chants to deities. Sramanas developed and laid emphasis on Ahimsa, Karma, moksa and renunciation.[55][56]

Schools and traditions[edit]

Jain philosophy arose from the shramana traditions. In its 2500 years post-Mahavira history, it remained fundamentally the same as preached by "Mahavira, who preached essentially the same religion as the previous "Tirthankara. "Harry Oldmeadow notes that the Jain philosophy remained fairly standard throughout history and the later elaborations only sought to further elucidate preexisting doctrine and avoided changing the ontological status of the components.[57] The schisms into "Śvetāmbara and "Digambara traditions arose mainly on account of differences in question of practice of nudity amongst monks and liberation of women. Apart from these minor differences in practices, there are no major philosophical differences between the different sects of Jainism. The "Tattvārthasūtra, which encapsulates major philosophical doctrines, is accepted by all traditions of Jainism. This coherence in philosophical doctrine and consistency across different schools has led scholars like Jaini to remark that in the course of history of Jainism no heretical movements like Mahayana, tantric or "bhakti movement developed outside mainstream Jainism.[58] Thus, there are traditions within Jainism, but basically the same philosophy that is at the core of Jainism.["citation needed]

Earlier traditions[edit]

As per the tradition, Jain Sangh was divided into two major sects:

The now defunct "Yapaniya sect followed the Digambara practice of nudity and eating from the hands while standing up along with Śvetāmbara beliefs and texts. They notably also permitted their ascetics to be "half-clothed" (ardhambara) in public areas only. The Yapaniya sect was absorbed into the Digambara community during the medieval period.["citation needed]

Medieval traditions[edit]

The period of 16th to 18th century was a period of reforms in Jainism. The following schools arose during this period :

Recent developments[edit]

Recent events lead to dissatisfaction with the monastic tradition and its related emphasis on austerities saw the arising of two new sects within Jainism in the 20th century. These were essentially led by the laity rather than ascetics and soon became a major force to be reckoned with. The non-sectarian cult of "Shrimad Rajchandra, who was one of the major influences on Mahatma Gandhi, is now one of the most popular movements. Another cult founded by "Kanjisvami, laying stress on determinism and "knowledge of self", has gained a large following as well.["citation needed]

Jain philosophers[edit]

Jains hold the Jain doctrine to be eternal and based on universal principles. In the current time cycle, they trace the origins of its philosophy to "Rishabhanatha, the first Tīrthankara. However, the tradition holds that the ancient "Jain texts and "Purvas which documented the Jain doctrine were lost and hence, historically, the Jain philosophy can be traced from "Mahavira's teachings. Post Mahavira many intellectual giants amongst the Jain ascetics contributed and gave a concrete form to the Jain philosophy within the parameters set by Mahavira. Following is the partial list of Jain philosophers and their contributions:["citation needed]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ "dravya – Jainism". Encyclopædia Britannica. 
  2. ^ Jansma & Jain 2006, p. 28.
  3. ^ Zimmer 1953, p. 59.
  4. ^ S.A. Jain 1992, p. 62–63,196.
  5. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 34–35.
  6. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2011, p. 99.
  7. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 35.
  8. ^ Dowling & Scarlett 2006, p. 226.
  9. ^ S.A. Jain 1992, p. 6.
  10. ^ S.A. Jain 1992, p. 7.
  11. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2011, p. 2.
  12. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 18.
  13. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 29.
  14. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 31.
  15. ^ Jain, Vijay K (2014-03-26). Acarya Pujyapada's Istopadesa – the Golden Discourse. p. 14. "ISBN "978-81-903639-6-9. 
  16. ^ Jaini, Padmanabh (1998) p. 272–273
  17. ^ Tatia, Nathmal (1994) p. 274–85
  18. ^ Champat Rai Jain 1917, p. 121.
  19. ^ Dowling & Scarlett 2006, p. 225.
  20. ^ Sanghvi 2008, p. 26.
  21. ^ Jaini 1998, p. 90.
  22. ^ James 1969, p. 45
  23. ^ Shah 1998, p. 47
  24. ^ Oldmeadow 2007, p. 149
  25. ^ Dundas 2002, p. 100.
  26. ^ a b Doniger 1999, p. 551.
  27. ^ Kritivijay 1957, p. 21.
  28. ^ Jaini 2000, p. 122.
  29. ^ Allday 2001, p. 268
  30. ^ Shah 1998, pp. 35–38
  31. ^ Glasenapp 1999, pp. 271–272
  32. ^ Glasenapp 1999, pp. 272
  33. ^ Dundas 2002, p. 40
  34. ^ Shah 1998, p. 25
  35. ^ Shah 1998, pp. 27–28
  36. ^ Doniger 1999, p. 550.
  37. ^ Prasad 2006, pp. 60–61
  38. ^ McEvilley 2002, p. 335
  39. ^ a b Sethia 2004, pp. 123–136
  40. ^ a b c *Koller, John M. (July 2000). "Syādvadā as the Epistemological Key to the Jaina Middle Way Metaphysics of Anekāntavāda". Philosophy East and West. Honolulu. 50 (3): 400–07. "ISSN 0031-8221. "JSTOR 1400182. "doi:10.1353/pew.2000.0009. 
  41. ^ Sethia 2004, pp. 400–407
  42. ^ Hughes 2005, pp. 590–591
  43. ^ Jaini 1998, p. 91
  44. ^ Huntington, Ronald. "Jainism and Ethics". Archived from the original on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 2012-12-11. 
  45. ^ Hay 1970, pp. 14–23
  46. ^ Chatterjea 2001, pp. 77–87
  47. ^ a b Grimes 1996, p. 312
  48. ^ a b Grimes 1996, pp. 202–203
  49. ^ McEvilley 2002, pp. 335–337
  50. ^ Shah 1998, p. 80
  51. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 61.
  52. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 68.
  53. ^ a b Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 88.
  54. ^ Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 90.
  55. ^ Pande 1994, pp. 134–136
  56. ^ Worthington 1982, pp. 27–30
  57. ^ Oldmeadow 2007, p. 148
  58. ^ Jaini 2000, pp. 31–35
  59. ^ a b c d e Jaini 1998, p. 85

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

) )