See more Library 2.0 articles on AOD.

Powered by
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia

Main article: "Online public access catalog § Next-generation catalogs

Library 2.0 is a new way of providing library service through new Internet technologies, with emphasis on “user-centered” change and interaction. Like Web 2.0, a full-featured Library 2.0 OPAC gets better the more that users are involved in the process of interacting with the catalog and sharing content.

Librarians have been working to retool library catalogs in order to make them more useful for patrons to find, organize, and interact with information in a way that has infinite potential for user customization. These new types of catalogs are a shift from "isolated information silos" to "interlinked computing platforms." In the past the information flow was mostly one way, from library to user. With new web tools information can be released to flow in every direction (library to user, user to library, library to library, and user to user).

"Jessamyn West, on her website, authored "What We Want: An OPAC Manifesto," which broke down the needs of library staff, geeks, and users in their OPAC. These valuable suggestions inform librarians of the flexibility, customizability and plain language approach that is desired by users in their OPAC. Librarians should be aware of these issues so that planning for improvement can begin.[8]

Nishat Kazi recommends that the clients interest area should be recorded when they join the library, and when they login to their account on the OPAC, new items which match their interests should be displayed to them. Kazi also recommends allowing clients to rank and review items in the OPAC, as well as giving other clients the opportunity to respond to these reviews. Key words can also be added by clients in addition to key words added by the librarian to facilitate searching.[9]


Library 2.0 has been a source of debate in the "blogosphere. Some librarian bloggers have argued that these key principles are not new and have been part of the service philosophies of many library reformers since the 19th century. Others are calling for more concrete examples of how libraries can get to Library 2.0. Walt Crawford, for example, argues that Library 2.0 comprises a combination of tools and attitudes which are excellent ideas and not new to librarianship, a few business- and tool-focused attitudes which will not serve all users and user communities, and incorrectly places libraries as the appropriate source for all users to gather all information.[10]

Proponents of Library 2.0, such as Stephen Abram,[11] Michael Stephens,[12] Paul Miller[13] and others, have spoken to these criticisms, arguing that while individual pieces of Library 2.0 may not be entirely new, the convergence of these service goals and ideas with many new Web 2.0 technologies has led to a new generation of library service. This includes the use of "online social networks by libraries.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d Michael E. Casey; Laura C. Savastinuk (1 September 2006). "Library 2.0: service for the next generation library". Library Journal. 
  2. ^ Miller, P., (2005). Web 2.0: Building the New Library. "Ariadne, No.45 October 2005.
  3. ^ Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M. & Widén-Wulff, G. (2009). What is Library 2.0?. "Journal of Documentation, 65(4): 668-681.
  4. ^ Byrne, Alex (November 2008). "Web 2.0 strategy in libraries and information services". The Australian Library Journal. 57 (4): 365–376. "doi:10.1080/00049670.2008.10722517. 
  5. ^ Steve Lawson (May 2006). "A Library 2.0 skeptic's reading list". Archived from the original on June 16, 2008. 
  6. ^ Library 2.0 and the Problem of Hate Speech
  7. ^ Carlsson, Hanna (January 2012). "Working with Facebook in Public Libraries: A Backstage Glimpse into the Library 2.0 Rhetoric". Libri. 62 (3). "doi:10.1515/libri-2012-0016. 
  8. ^ Jessamyn West. "What We Want: An OPAC Manifesto". 
  9. ^ Kazi, Nishat (Jan–Mar 2012). "Towards Serving User 2.0". International Journal of Information Dissemination & Technology. 2 (1): 74–76. "ISSN 2229-5984. 
  10. ^ Walt Crawford (2006). "Library 2.0 and 'Library 2.0'" (PDF). Cites and Insights. 6 (2). 
  11. ^ S. Abram; M. Casey; J. Blyberg; M. Stephens (2006). "A SirsiDynix Institute Conversation: The 2.0 Meme - Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Librarian 2.0". Archived from the original on 2008-03-11. 
  12. ^ M. Casey; M. Stephens (2006). "Better Library Services for More People". ALA TechSource Blog. 
  13. ^ P. Miller; K. Chad (2005). "Do libraries matter? - The rise of Library 2.0" (PDF). Talis. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-11-25. 

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

) )