See more Psychological effects of Internet use articles on AOD.

Powered by
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia

See also: "Internet anonymity and "Anonymous post

Interacting on the Internet mostly does not involve "physical" interactions with another person (i.e. face-to-face conversation), and therefore easily leads to a person feeling free to act differently online, as well as unrestraint in "civility and minimization of authority, etc.

People who are "socially anxious are more likely to use electronic communication as their only means of communication. This, in turn, makes them more likely to disclose personal information to strangers online that they normally wouldn't give out face-to-face.[25] The phenomenon is a likely cause for the prevalence of "cyberbullying, especially for children who do not understand "social networking etiquette."

Internet anonymity can lead to "online disinhibition, in which people do and say things online that they normally wouldn't do or say in person. Psychology researcher John Suler differentiates between benign disinhibition in which people can grow psychologically by revealing secret emotions, fears, and wishes and showing unusual acts of kindness and generosity and toxic disinhibition, in which people use rude language, harsh criticisms, anger, hatred and threats or visit pornographic or violent sites that they wouldn't in the 'real world.' [26]

Internet addiction[edit]

Internet addiction disorder

People become "addicted or dependent on the Internet through excessive computer use that interferes with daily life. "Kimberly S. Young[27] links internet addiction disorder with existing mental health issues, most commonly depression. Young states that the disorder has significant effects socially, psychologically and occupationally.

"Aric Sigman’s presentation to members of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health outlined the parallels between screen dependency and alcohol and drug addiction: the instant stimulation provided by all those flickering graphics leads to the release of "dopamine, a chemical that’s central to the brain’s reward system".[28]

A 2009 study suggested that brain structural changes were present in those classified by the researchers as Internet addicted, similar to those classified as chemically addicted.[29]

In one study,the researchers selected seventeen subjects with online gaming addiction and another seventeen naive internet users who rarely used the internet. Using a magnetic resonance imaging scanner, they performed a scan to "acquire 3-dimensional T1-weighted images" of the subject's brain. The results of the scan revealed that online gaming addiction "impairs gray and white matter integrity in the orbitofrontal cortex of the prefrontal regions of the brain".[30] According to Keath Low, psychotherapist, the "orbitofrontal cortex "has a major impact on our ability to perform such tasks as planning, prioritizing, paying attention to and remembering details, and controlling our mention".[31] As a result, these online gaming addicts are incapable of prioritizing their life or setting a goal and accomplishing it because of the impairment of their orbitofrontal cortex.



Ease of access to the Internet can increase "escapism in which a user uses the Internet as an "escape" from the perceived unpleasant or banal aspects of daily/"real life. Because the internet and virtual realities easily satisfy social needs and drives, according to Jim Blascovich and Jeremy Bailensen, "sometimes [they are] so satisfying that addicted users will withdraw physically from society.” Stanford psychiatrist Dr. Elias Aboujaoude believes that advances in virtual reality and immersive 3-D have led us to “where we can have a ‘full life’ [online] that can be quite removed from our own.” Eventually, virtual reality may drastically change a person’s social and emotional needs. “We may stop ‘needing’ or craving real social interactions because they may become foreign to us,” Aboujaoude says.[32]

Effects on children[edit]

"Internet has its impact on all age groups from elders to children. According to the article 'Digital power: exploring the effects of social media on children’s spirituality', children consider the Internet as their third place after home and school.[33]

One of the main effects social media has had on children is the effect of cyber bullying. A study carried out by 177 students in Canada found that “15% of the students admitted that they cyberbullied others” while “40% of the cyber victims had no idea who the bullies were”.[34] The psychological harm cyber bullying can cause is reflected in low self-esteem, depression and anxiety. It also opens up avenues for manipulation and control. Cyber bullying has ultimately led to depression, anxiety and in severe cases suicide. Suicide is the third leading cause of death for youth between the ages of 10 and 24. Cyber bullying is rapidly increasing. Some writers have suggested monitoring and educating children from a young age about the risks associated with cyber bullying.["citation needed]

Effects on parenting[edit]

"A psychologist, Aric Sigman, warned of the perils of “passive "parenting” and “benign "neglect” caused by parent's reliance on gadgets".[28] In some cases, parents' internet addictions can have drastic effects on their children. In 2009, a three-year-old girl from New Mexico died of malnutrition and dehydration on the same day that her mother was said to have spent 15 hours playing World of Warcraft online.[32] In another case in 2014, a Korean couple let their real baby die because they were so immersed in a video game that allowed them to raise a virtual child online.[35] The effects of the Internet on parenting can be observed a how parents utilize the Internet, the response to their child's Internet consumption, as well as the effects and influences that the Internet has on the relationship between parent and child.

Parental Internet use and opinions towards family impact[edit]

Overall, parents are seen to do simple tasks such as sending e-mails and keep up with current events whereas social networking sites are less frequented. In regards to researching parental material, a study conducted in January 2012 by the "University of Minnesota found that 75% of questioned parents have stated that the Internet improves their method of obtaining parenting related information, 19.7% found parenting websites too complex to navigate, and 13.1% of the group did not find any useful parenting information on any website.[36]

Many studies have shown that parents view the Internet as a hub of information especially in their children's education.[37] They feel that it is a valuable commodity that can enhance their learning experience and when used in this manner it does not contribute to any family tension or conflicts. However, when the Internet is used as a social medium (either online gaming or social networking sites) there is a positive correlation between the use of the Internet and family conflicts. In conjunction with using the Internet for social means, there is a risk of exposing familial information to strangers, which is perceived to parents as a threat and can ultimately weaken family boundaries.

Parental response to child online consumption[edit]

A report released in October 2012 by "Ofcom focused on the amount of online consumption done by children aged 5–15 and how the parents react to their child’s consumption. Of the parents interviewed, 85% use a form of online mediation ranging from face-to-face talks with their children about online surfing to cellphone browser filters. The remaining 15% of parents do not take active measures to adequately inform their children of safe Internet browsing; these parents have either spoken only briefly to their children about cautious surfing or do not do anything at all.

Parents are active in monitoring their child’s online use by using methods such as investigating the browsing history and by regulating Internet usage. However, since parents are less versed in Internet usage than their children they are more concerned with the Internet interfering with family life than online matters such as "child grooming or "cyber-bullying.

When addressing those with lack of parental control over the Internet, parents state that their child is rarely alone (defined for children from 5–11 years old) or that they trust their children when they are online (for children 12–15 years old). Approximately 80% of parents ensure that their child has been taught Internet safety from school and 70% of parents feel that the benefits of using the Internet are greater than the risks that come along with it.[38]

Conversely an American study, conducted by PewInternet released on November 20, 2012, reveal that parents are highly concerned about the problems the Internet can impose on their teenage children. 47% of parents are tend to worry about their children being exposed to inappropriate material on the Internet and 45% of the parents are concerned about their children’s behaviour towards each other both online offline. Only 31% of parents showed concern about the Internet taking away social time from the family.[39]

Effects of Internet use on parent-child relationships[edit]

Researcher Sanford Grossbart and others explores the relationship between the mother and child and how Internet use affects this relationship. This study forms its basis around Marvin Sussman and Suzanne Steinmetz’s idea that the relationship between parent and child is highly influenced by the changing experiences and events of each generation.[40] “Parental warmth” is a factor in how receptive a parent is to being taught the nuances of the Internet by their child versus the traditional method of the parent influencing the child. If the parent displayed “warm” tendencies she was more open to learning how to use the Internet from their child even if the parent happened to be more knowledgeable on the subject. This fosters teaching in a positive environment, which sustains a strong relationship between mother and child, encourages education, and promotes mature behaviour. “Cooler” mothers only allowed themselves to be taught if they thought that their child held the same amount of knowledge or greater and would dismiss the teaching otherwise suggesting a relationship that stems from the majority of influence coming from the parent.[41]

However, despite warm and cool parenting methods, parents who encounter a language barrier rely more heavily on their children to utilize the Internet. Vikki Katz of "Rutgers University has studied the interaction between immigrant parents and children and how they use technology. Katz notes that the majority resources that immigrants find helpful are located online, however the search algorithms currently in place do not direct languages other than English appropriately. Because of this shortcoming, parents strongly encourage their bilingual children to bridge the gap between the Internet and language.[42]

The Internet is increasingly being used as a virtual babysitter when parents actively download applications specifically for their children with intentions to keep them calm. A survey conducted by "Ipsos has found that half of the interviewed parents believe children ages 8–13 are old enough to own or carry smartphones thus increasing online content consumption in younger generations.[43]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Carr, Pinker, the shallows, and the nature-nurture canard : Neuron Culture". Retrieved 20 September 2011. 
  2. ^ "Author Nicholas Carr: The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains | Magazine". 2010-05-24. Retrieved 4 July 2010. 
  3. ^ "The effects of the Internet: Fast forward". The Economist. 2010-06-24. Retrieved 4 July 2010. 
  4. ^ a b "Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior, by Krishnan and Sitaraman, ACM Internet Measurement Conference" (PDF). November 2012. 
  5. ^ a b "Patience is a Network Effect, by Nicholas Carr, Nov 2012". 
  6. ^ a b The Patience Deficit, by Nicholas Carr, Dec 2013.
  7. ^ "NPR Morning Edition: In Video-Streaming Rat Race, Fast is Never Fast Enough, October 2012". 
  8. ^ "Science Daily: How Online Video Stream Quality Affect Viewer Behavior, November 2012". 
  9. ^ "CNN: Online viewers ditch slow-loading video after 2 seconds, November 2012". 
  10. ^ "Boston Globe: Instant gratification is making us perpetually impatient, Feb 2013". 
  11. ^ Pinker, Steven (2010-06-10). "Mind Over Mass Media". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 July 2010. 
  12. ^ Helen Briggs (11 January 2012). "Web addicts have brain changes, research suggests". BBC News. Retrieved 17 March 2013. 
  13. ^ Yuan K, Qin W, Wang G, Zeng F, Zhao L, et al. (3 June 2011). "Microstructure Abnormalities in Adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder". PLoS ONE. 6: e20708. "doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020708. "PMC 3108989Freely accessible. "PMID 21677775. Retrieved 17 March 2013. 
  14. ^ Nicholas Carr (24 May 2010). "The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 20 September 2011. 
  15. ^ Nicholas Carr (1 July 2008). "Is Google Making Us Stupid?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 20 September 2011. 
  16. ^ "The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future", I Rowlands, D Nicholas, P Williams; P Huntington, M Fieldhouse, B Gunter, R Withey, HR Jamali, T Dobrowolski, C Tenopir, ASLIB Proceedings, vol. 60, issue 4 (2008), pp. 290-310, The Association for Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/00012530810887953. Retrieved 15 October 2013.
  17. ^ Chivers, Tom (2009-10-21). "Internet use 'may improve brain function in adults', says UCLA study". The Telegraph UK. 
  18. ^ "Internet Use Increases Brain Activity in Seniors". DailyChump. 2012. 
  19. ^ "Internet use 'good for the brain'". BBC News. 2008-10-14. 
  20. ^ Jung, Brian. "The Negative Effect of Social Media on Society and Individuals". Chron. Hearst Communications, Inc. Retrieved 8 February 2013. 
  21. ^ "Losing our minds to the web". Prospect Magazine. 2010-06-22. Retrieved 20 September 2011. 
  22. ^ Richtel, Matt (2010-06-06). "Attached to Technology and Paying a Price". The New York Times. 
  23. ^ a b "Attention Span Statistics". Statistic Brain. The Associated Press. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  24. ^ Goldsmith, Belinda (31 March 2007). "Web news readers have greater attention span: study". Reuters. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  25. ^ Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age
  26. ^ JOHN SULER, Ph.D."The Online Disinhibition Effect" ,CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR Volume 7, Number 3, 2004
  27. ^ Young K (1998). "The relationship between depression and internet addiction". CyberPsychology & Behavior. 1: 25–28. "doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.25. 
  28. ^ a b Rowan Pelling (22 May 2012). "How technology is taking hold of our children's lives". Telegraph. Retrieved 26 May 2012. 
  29. ^ Zhou Y, et al. (2009). "Gray matter abnormalities in Internet addiction: A voxel-based morphometry study". European Journal of Radiology. 79: 92–95. "doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.025. 
  30. ^ Weng, Chuan-Bu (2013). "Gray matter and white matter abnormalities in online game addiction". Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 92: 3221–3. "PMID 23328472. 
  31. ^ Low, Keath. "Executive functions and ADD - ADHD. What are executive functions? How do executive functions relate to ADD - ADHD?". 
  32. ^ a b Monica Kim, "The Good and the Bad of Escaping to Virtual Reality", The Atlantic, February 20, 2015
  33. ^ "Digital power: exploring the effects of social media on children's spirituality". International Journal of Children's Spirituality. 19: 133–143. "doi:10.1080/1364436X.2014.924908. 
  34. ^ Li, Q (2010). "cyberbullying in high schools: A Study of student behaviours and beliefs about this new phenomenon". journal of aggression, Maltreatment and trauma: 372–392. 
  35. ^ Sean Elder, "Korean Couple Let Baby Die While They Played Video Game", Newsweek, August 14, 2014
  36. ^ Jessie Connell (March 2012). "Parents' Use of Technology and the Internet" (PDF). University of Minnesota. 
  37. ^ Mesch, Gustavo (2007). "Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach" (PDF). The Journal of Family Communication: 119–138. 
  38. ^ "Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report" (PDF). Ofcom. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  39. ^ Mary Madden; Sandra Cortesi; Urs Gasser; Amanda Lenhart; Maeve Duggan (20 November 2012). "Parents, Teens, and Online Privacy". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  40. ^ Sussman, Marvin; Suzanne Steinmetz (1987). Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum Press. 
  41. ^ Sanford Grossbart; Stephanie McConnell Hughes; Susie Pryor; Amber Yost (2002). "Socialization Aspects of Parents, Children, and the Internet". Advances in Consumer Research. 29: 66–70. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  42. ^ Schmidt, Alex (12 October 2011). "Immigrant Parents Rely On Kids For Help Online". NPR. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 
  43. ^ Atagana, Michelle (21 September 2012). "US parents relying on mobile devices to entertain their kids [Survey]". Memeburn. Retrieved 10 February 2013. 

External links[edit]

) )