|Formed||September 20, 1991|
|Headquarters||32–35, Volodymyrska street, "Kiev, 01034 |
|Employees||29,000 (November 2017(30,000 in February 2014)|
|Parent agency||"President of Ukraine|
|History of State
Security of Ukraine
|"" "Ukrainian SSR|
|This article is part of a series on the
"politics and government of
The Security Service of Ukraine ("Ukrainian: Служба Безпеки України (СБУ); Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny) or SBU, is "Ukraine's law-enforcement authority and main government "security agency in the areas of counterintelligence activity and terrorism combatting.
The Security Service of Ukraine is vested, within its competence defined by law, with the protection of national sovereignty, constitutional order, territorial integrity, economical, scientific, technical, and defense potential of Ukraine, legal interests of the state, and civil rights, from intelligence and subversion activities of foreign special services and from unlawful interference attempted by certain organizations, groups and individuals, as well with ensuring the protection of state secrets.
Other duties include combating crimes that endanger the peace and security of mankind, terrorism, corruption, and organized criminal activities in the sphere of management and economy, as well as other unlawful acts immediately threatening Ukraine's vital interests.
Department of the People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs
Special Commission of the All Ukrainian Revolutionary Committee
Special Commission of the "Council of People's Commissars of Ukraine
Special Commission of the "Council of People's Commissars of Ukraine
Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
The All-Ukrainian Cheka was formed on December 3, 1918 in "Kursk on the initiative from "Yakov Sverdlov and "Lenin's orders. The commission was formed on the decree of the Provisional Workers' Peasant Government of the Ukrainian SSR and later adopted on May 30, 1919 by the "All Ukrainian Central Executive Committee. To support the Soviet government in Ukraine in Moscow was formed a corps of special assignment with 24,500 soldiers as part of the All-Ukrainian Cheka. In spring 1919 there was created the Council in fight against counterrevolution and consisted of "Adolph Joffe, "Stanislav Kosior, and "Martin Latsis. In its early years the security agency fought against the "kulak-nationalistic banditry" (against people who opposed creation of collective farms). On August 19, 1920 the All Ukrainian Cheka arrested all members of the All Ukrainian Conference of Mensheviks after accusing them in counterrevolution. On December 10, 1934 the State Political Directorate was liquidated.
Since 1992, the agency has been competing in "intelligence functions with the "intelligence branch of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. Despite this, a former Military Intelligence Chief and career "GRU technological espionage expert, "Ihor Smeshko, served as an SBU chief until 2005.
In 2004, the SBU's Intelligence Department was reorganized into an independent agency called "Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine. It is responsible for all kinds of intelligence as well as for external security. As of 2004, the exact functions of the new service, and respective responsibilities of the "Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine were not regulated yet. On November 7, 2005 the President of Ukraine created the Ukraine State Service of special communications and protection of information, also known as Derzhspetszvyazok (StateSpecCom) in place of one of the departments of SBU and making it an autonomous agency. The SBU subsumed the Directorate of State Protection of Ukraine ("Ukrainian: Управління державної охорони України), the personal protection agency for the most senior government officials, which was the former Ninth Directorate of the Ukrainian KGB.
The SBU's State Directorate of Personal Protection is known for its former Major "Mykola Mel'nychenko, the "communications protection agent in President "Leonid Kuchma's "bodyguard team. Mel'nychenko was the central figure of the "Cassette Scandal (2000)—one of the main events in Ukraine's post-independence history. SBU became involved in the case when Mel'nychenko accused Leonid Derkach, SBU Chief at the time, of several crimes, e.g., of clandestine relations with "Russian mafia leader "Semyon Mogilevich. However, the UDO was subsumed into the SBU after the scandal, so Mel'nychenko himself has never been an SBU agent.
In 2004, General Valeriy Kravchenko, SBU's intelligence representative in Germany, publicly accused his agency of political involvement, including overseas spying on Ukrainian "opposition politicians and German TV journalists. He was fired without returning home. After a half-year of hiding in Germany, Kravchenko returned to Ukraine and surrendered in October 2004 (an investigation is underway).
Later, the agency commanders became involved in the scandal around the "poisoning of "Viktor Yushchenko—a main candidate in the "2004 Ukrainian presidential election. Yushchenko felt unwell soon after supper with SBU Chief Ihor Smeshko, at the home of Smeshko's first deputy. However, neither the politician himself nor the investigators have ever directly accused these officers. It is also important to note that the Personal Protection department has been officially responsible for Yushchenko's personal security since he became a candidate. During the "Orange Revolution, several SBU veterans and "cadets publicly supported him as president-elect, while the agency as a whole remained neutral.
In 2005, soon after the elections, sacked SBU Chief Smeshko and other intelligence agents stated their own version of the revolution's events. They claimed to have prevented "militsiya from violently suppressing the protests, contradicting the orders of President Kuchma and threatening militsiya with armed involvement of SBU's "special forces units. This story was first described by the American journalist C.J. Chivers of "The New York Times and has never been supported with documents or legally.
An episode of human rights abuse by SBU happened during the case of "serial killer "Anatoly Onoprienko. Yuriy Mozola, an initial suspect in the investigation, died in SBU custody in "Lviv as a result of "torture. Several agents were convicted in the case. The SBU remains a political controversial subject in Ukrainian politics.
The former Security Service of Ukraine Head "Valeriy Khoroshkovsky was involved in several controversies during his tenure. The rector of the Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv "Borys Gudziak heavily criticized a visit from the SBU, forcing Khoroshkovskiy to apologize. Later the head of the Kiev Bureau of the "Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Nico Lange, was detained for a short while and released only after several high-ranking officials from the "German Chancellery vouched for him. The Security Service described the incident as a misunderstanding. Khoroshkovskiy, as the Chairman of the SBU, eliminated the main competition of Ukrainian TV-giant "Inter,["citation needed] officially owned by his wife Olena Khoroshkovskiy, in the face of "TVi and "Channel 5. In July 2010, Konrad Schuller of the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung wrote that Khoroshkovskiy had connections with "RosUkrEnergo. The most important source of Khoroshkovskiy's["clarification needed] came from RosUkrEnergo.["citation needed] The President's spokesperson, "Hanna Herman, in an interview with this newspaper, did not dispute that "Dmytro Firtash was one of the sponsors of the Presidential "Party of Regions, with the help of which Khoroshkovskiy was appointed to the position of the State Security chairman. Khoroshkovskiy denied any connections to RosUkrEnergo. However it is a fact["citation needed] that Firtash possesses certain privileges in Inter. Schuller also stated that the SBU acts in direct association with RosUkrEnergo, arresting their main opponents (see "RosUkrEnergo) in order to recover their invested money in the recent["which?] presidential campaign. Khoroshkovskiy having declined to give an interview to "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Schuller posted a quote from one of his other interviews:
|“||All my experience until now indicates that I am a patriot. ... I see through economic intrigues, crime, know methods of money laundering, banks that illegally exchange currency. ... My knowledge is much wider than most of those who work here.||”|
When "Minister of Finance Fedir Yaroshenko resigned on January 18, 2012, Khoroshkovsky replaced him in the post on the same day. Khoroshkovsky is also the owner of "U.A. Inter Media Group which owns major shares in various "Ukrainian TV channels including "Inter TV. 238 members of the "Verkhovna Rada voted for Khoroshkovsky, however the head of the parliamentary committee for the National Security and Defense "Anatoliy Hrytsenko stated that the committee accepted the decision to recommend "Verkhovna Rada to deny the candidature of Khoroshkovskiy on the post of the chairman of Security Service of Ukraine.
Khoroshkovskiy said the SBU's main duty was to protect the president rather than the interests of Ukraine. On July 26, 2010 it arrested an internet blogger, producing a warrant for his arrest the next day. SBU accused the blogger of threatening the "President of Ukraine, citing his comment "May thunder strike Yanukovych!"; he was released after a short discussion. However, SBU showed a rather passive reaction to the statements of the Russian state official who claimed that "Crimea and "Sevastopol belong to the "Russian Federation. "Protest group "FEMEN said that after "the early 2010 election of "President "Viktor Yanukovych the SBU attempted to intimidate the FEMEN activists.
On May 22, 2012 Volodymyr Rokytskyi, Deputy Head of the SBU, was photographed in public wearing a $32,000 "luxury "wristwatch despite the fact that its price amounts to his yearly official income. The instance happened at a joint Ukrainian-American event dedicated to fighting the "drug trade.
The SBU uncovered seven spies and 16 special service agents in 2009.
A large number of arrests and searches occurred in 2011.
In February 2014, numerous documents, hard drives, and flash drives, including data on over 22,000 officers and informants, were stolen or destroyed in a raid on the SBU allegedly ordered by President "Viktor Yanukovych.
Late February 2014 opposition MP "Hennadiy Moskal released papers that showed the SBU had allegedly infiltrated the late 2013-February 2014 anti-government "Euromaidan protest. According to "BBC Ukraine analyst Olexiy Solohubenko many tactics discussed in the paper had indeed been performed.
After the overthrow of Yanukovich in the February "2014 Ukrainian revolution the new SBU head "Valentyn Nalyvaichenko claimed to have found his new office building empty, saying "the agency’s former leadership had all fled to "Russia or "Crimea. There were no operative files, no weapons. Institutionally, the place was totally destroyed". Nalyvaichenko also claimed that at that time the agency was heavily infiltrated by Russian spies. Indeed, Nalyvaichenko predecessor "Oleksandr Yakymenko with about 15 former SBU top officials surfaced in Russia a few days later. Allegedly in the months following the 2014 Ukrainian revolution thousands of Ukrainian spies switched sides and began reporting to Russia during the "2014 Crimean crisis and the "2014 pro-Russian unrest in "east and "south Ukraine. At the end of 2014 235 SBU agents, including the former counterintelligence chief and his cousin, and hundreds of other operatives had been arrested and 25 high treason probes against Yanukovych-era SBU officials had been launched; also all regional directors had been changed, as well as half of their deputies. In July 2015 Nalyvaichenko claimed “There’s no longer a total infiltration of Russian agents. The danger is no longer widespread”. The arrested agents were replaced by new recruits from "western Ukraine, many of them in their early twenties. To test loyalty, all SBU agents are subjected to recurrent interrogations and "lie detector tests.
In June 2015, the "Kyiv Post reported that a deputy chief of the SBU, Vitaly Malikov, had supported events leading to the "March 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea. According to February 2016 official figures of the "Ukrainian parliamentary Committee on National Security, after Russia's annexation 10% of SBU personnel left Crimea. According to the SBU itself (in November 2017) 13% did so.
According to reports of UN human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine the SBU personnel is accountable for multiple cases of human rights abuses including enforced disappearings, sexual violence and torture.
In the 2016 "Amnesty International and "human Rights Watch reported that the SBU operates secret detention facilities where civilians are held incommunicado being subjected to improper treatment and torture.
In December 2017 the UN mission in Ukraine expressed concerns about a situation with "freedom of opinion and expression" in Ukraine which facing "mounting challenges". According to the UN reports the SBU is taking advantage of broad interpretation and application of Ukrainian Criminal Code against independent Ukrainian journalists, bloggers and media activists.