The skeptical movement ("also spelled sceptical) is a modern "social movement based on the idea of scientific skepticism (also called rational skepticism). Scientific "skepticism is the application of skeptical "philosophy, "critical thinking skills, and "knowledge of "science and its "methods to "empirical claims, while remaining "agnostic or neutral to non-empirical claims (except those that directly impact the practice of science). The movement has the goal of investigating claims made on "fringe topics and determining if they are supported by "empirical research and are "reproducible, as part of a methodological norm pursuing "the extension of certified knowledge". The process followed is sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry.
Roots of the movement can be found in the 19th century when questions began to be publicly raised regarding the unquestioned acceptance of claims of "spiritism, various widely held "superstitions, and "pseudoscience. Medical quackery was also targeted by publications such as the Dutch "Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij (1881).
Using as a template the Belgian organization founded in 1949, "Comité Para, Americans "Paul Kurtz and "Marcello Truzzi founded the "Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), in "Amherst, New York in 1976. Now known as the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), the work of this organization has inspired the formation of similar groups worldwide.
Scientific skepticism is different from "philosophical skepticism, which questions humans' ability to claim any knowledge about the nature of the world and how they perceive it. "Methodological skepticism, a systematic process of being skeptical about (or doubting) the truth of one's beliefs, is similar but distinct. The New Skepticism described by "Paul Kurtz is scientific skepticism. For example, "Robert K. Merton asserts that all ideas must be tested and are subject to rigorous, structured community scrutiny (as described in "Mertonian norms).
An important difference to classical skepticism is, according to religious history professor "Olav Hammer, that it is not directly aligned with classical "pyrrhonian scepticism, which would question all sort of orthodox wisdom, as well as the one established by modern science. According to Hammer, "the intellectual forebears of the modern skeptical movement are rather to be found among the many writers throughout history who have argued against beliefs they did not share."
The following are quotations related to scientific skepticism:
What sceptical thinking boils down to is the means to construct, and to understand, a reasoned argument and, especially important, to recognize a fallacious or fraudulent argument. The question is not whether we like the conclusion that emerges out of a train of reasoning, but whether the conclusion follows from the premises or starting point and whether that premise is true.
Science is [...] a way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we’re up for grabs for the next charlatan, political or religious, who comes ambling along.
Scientific skepticism (is) the practice or project of studying paranormal and pseudoscientific claims through the lens of science and critical scholarship, and then sharing the results with the public.
A skeptic is one who prefers beliefs and conclusions that are reliable and valid to ones that are comforting or convenient, and therefore rigorously and openly applies the methods of science and reason to all empirical claims, especially their own. A skeptic provisionally proportions acceptance of any claim to valid logic and a fair and thorough assessment of available evidence, and studies the pitfalls of human reason and the mechanisms of deception so as to avoid being deceived by others or themselves. Skepticism values method over any particular conclusion.
"Skepticism is a provisional approach to claims. It is the application of reason to any and all ideas—no sacred cows allowed. In other words, skepticism is a method, not a position."
With regard to the skeptical social movement, Loxton refers to other movements already promoting "humanism, atheism, rationalism, science education and even critical thinking" before. He saw the demand for the new movement—a movement of people called "skeptics" — being based on a lack of interest by the scientific community to address paranormal and fringe science claims. In line with "Kendrick Frazier, he describes the movement as a surrogate in that area for institutional science. The movement set up a distinct field of study, and provided an organizational structure, while long-standing genre of individual skeptical activities lacked such a community and background. Skeptical organizations typically tend to have science education and promotion among their goals.
Scientific skeptics maintain that empirical investigation of "reality leads to the "truth, and that the "scientific method is best suited to this purpose. Scientific skeptics attempt to evaluate "claims based on verifiability and "falsifiability and discourage accepting claims on "faith or "anecdotal evidence. Skeptics often focus their criticism on claims they consider to be implausible, dubious or clearly contradictory to generally accepted "science. Scientific skeptics do not assert that unusual claims should be automatically rejected out of hand on "a priori grounds—rather they argue that claims of paranormal or anomalous phenomena should be critically examined and that extraordinary claims would require extraordinary evidence in their favor before they could be accepted as having validity. From a scientific point of view, theories are judged on many criteria, such as falsifiability, "Occam's Razor, "Morgan's Canon and "explanatory power, as well as the degree to which their "predictions match "experimental results. Skepticism in general may be deemed part of the "scientific method; for instance an experimental result is not regarded as established until it can be shown to be repeatable independently.
The skeptic spectrum has been characterized as divided into "wet" and "dry" sceptics, primarily based on the level of engagement with those promoting claims that appear to be pseudoscience; the dry skeptics preferring to debunk and ridicule, in order to avoid giving attention and thus credence to the promoters, and the "wet" skeptics, preferring slower and more considered engagement, in order to avoid appearing sloppy and ill-considered and thus similar to the groups all skeptics opposed.:389
The movement has had issues with sexism. It was raised in a 1985 skeptic newsletter by Mary Coulman.:112 The skeptic movement has generally been made up of men; at a 1987 conference the members there discussed the fact that the attendees were predominantly older white men and a 1991 listing of 50 CSICOP fellows included four women.:109 Following a 2011 conference, "Rebecca Watson, a prominent skeptic,:57 raised issues of the way female skeptics are targeted with "online harassment including threats of sexual violence by opponents of the movement, and also raised issues of sexism within the movement itself; while she received some support in response to her discussion of sexism within the movement, she was mocked by Dawkins and became a target of virulent online harassment from other skeptics, which included rape threats. This became known as ""Elevatorgate", based on Watson's discussion about being propositioned in a hotel elevator in the early morning after a skeptic event.
The term "debunk" is used to describe efforts by skeptics to expose or discredit claims believed to be false, exaggerated, or pretentious. It is closely associated with skeptical investigation or rational inquiry of controversial topics (compare "list of topics characterized as pseudoscience) such as "U.F.O.s, claimed "paranormal phenomena, "cryptids, "conspiracy theories, "alternative medicine, "religion, or exploratory or "fringe areas of scientific or "pseudoscientific research.
Further topics that scientifically skeptical literature questions include health claims surrounding certain foods, procedures, and "alternative medicines; the plausibility and existence of "supernatural abilities (e.g. "tarot reading) or entities (e.g. "poltergeists, "angels, "gods—including "Zeus); the monsters of "cryptozoology (e.g. the "Loch Ness monster); as well as "creationism/"intelligent design, "dowsing, "conspiracy theories, and other claims the skeptic sees as unlikely to be true on scientific grounds.
Skeptics such as "James Randi have become famous for "debunking claims related to some of these. Paranormal investigator "Joe Nickell cautions, however, that "debunkers" must be careful to engage paranormal claims seriously and without bias. He explains that open minded investigation is more likely to teach and change minds than debunking.
The scientific skepticism community has traditionally been focused on what people believe rather than why they believe—there might be psychological, cognitive or instinctive reasons for belief when there is little evidence for such beliefs. According to Hammer, the bulk of the skeptical movement's literature works on an implicit model, that belief in the irrational is being based on scientific illiteracy or cognitive illusions. He points to the skeptical discussion about astrology: The skeptical notion of astrology as a "failed hypothesis" fails to address basic "anthropological assumptions about astrology as a form of ritualized "divination. While the anthropological approach attempts to explain the activities of astrologers and their clients, the skeptical movement's interest in the cultural aspects of such beliefs is muted.
According to sociologist David J. Hess, the skeptical discourse tends to set science and the skeptical project apart from the social and the economic. From this perspective, he argues that skepticism takes on some aspects of a sacred discourse, as in "Emile Durkheim's "Elementary Forms of the Religious Life—Science, seen as pure and sacred (motivated by values of the mind and reason), is set apart from popular dealings with the paranormal, seen as profane (permeated by the economic and the social); obscuring the confrontation between science and religion. Hess states as well a strong tendency in "othering: both skeptics and their opponents see the other as being driven by materialistic philosophy and material gain and assume themselves to have purer motives.
While not all pseudoscientific beliefs are necessarily dangerous, some can potentially be harmful. "Plato believed that to release others from ignorance despite their initial resistance is a great and noble thing. Modern skeptical writers address this question in a variety of ways. "Bertrand Russell argued that some individual actions based on beliefs for which there is no evidence of efficacy, can result in destructive actions. "James Randi often writes on the issue of "fraud by psychics and faith healers. Unqualified medical practice and alternative medicine can result in serious injury and death.["citation needed] "Richard Dawkins points to religion as a source of violence (notably in "The God Delusion), and considers "creationism a threat to biology. Some skeptics, such as the members of "The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast, oppose "certain new religious movements because of their cult-like behaviors.
"Leo Igwe, Junior Fellow at the Bayreuth International Graduate School of African Studies and past Research Fellow of the "James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), wrote A Manifesto for a Skeptical Africa, which received endorsements from multiple public activists in Africa, as well as skeptical endorsers around the world. He is a Nigerian human rights advocate and campaigner against the impacts of "child witchcraft accusations. Igwe came into conflict with high-profile "witchcraft believers, leading to attacks on himself and his family.
Richard Cameron Wilson, in an article in "New Statesman, wrote that "the bogus sceptic is, in reality, a disguised dogmatist, made all the more dangerous for his success in appropriating the mantle of the unbiased and open-minded inquirer". Some advocates of discredited intellectual positions (such as "AIDS denial, "Holocaust denial and "climate change denial) engage in pseudoskeptical behavior when they characterize themselves as "skeptics". This is despite their "cherry picking of evidence that conforms to a pre-existing belief. According to Wilson, who highlights the phenomenon in his 2008 book Don't Get Fooled Again, the characteristic feature of false skepticism is that it "centres not on an impartial search for the truth, but on the defence of a preconceived ideological position".
Scientific skepticism is itself sometimes criticized on this ground. The term pseudoskepticism has found occasional use in controversial fields where opposition from scientific skeptics is strong. For example, in 1994, "Susan Blackmore, a parapsychologist who became more skeptical and eventually became a "Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) fellow in 1991, described what she termed the "worst kind of pseudoskepticism":
There are some members of the skeptics' groups who clearly believe they know the right answer prior to inquiry. They appear not to be interested in weighing alternatives, investigating strange claims, or trying out psychic experiences or altered states for themselves (heaven forbid!), but only in promoting their own particular belief structure and cohesion ...
Commenting on the labels "dogmatic" and "pathological" that the "Association for Skeptical Investigation" puts on critics of paranormal investigations, "Bob Carroll of the "Skeptic's Dictionary argues that that association "is a group of pseudo-skeptical paranormal investigators and supporters who do not appreciate criticism of paranormal studies by truly genuine skeptics and critical thinkers. The only skepticism this group promotes is skepticism of critics and [their] criticisms of paranormal studies."
According to skeptic author "Daniel Loxton, "skepticism is a story without a beginning or an end." His article Why Is There a Skeptical Movement claims a history of two millennia of paranormal skepticism. He is of the opinion that the practice, problems, and central concepts extend all the way to antiquity and refers to a debunking tale as told "in some versions of the Old Testament, where the Prophet Daniel exposes a tale of a "living" statue as a scam. According to Loxton, throughout history, there are further examples of individuals practicing critical inquiry and writing books or performing publicly against particular frauds and popular superstitions, including people like "Lucian of Samosata (2nd century), "Michel de Montaigne (16th century), "Thomas Ady and "Thomas Browne (17th century), "Antoine Lavoisier and "Benjamin Franklin (18th century), many different philosophers, scientists and magicians throughout the 19th and early 20th century up until and after "Harry Houdini. However, skeptics banding together in societies that research the paranormal and fringe science is a modern phenomenon.
"Daniel Loxton mentions the Belgian "Comité Para (1949) as the oldest "broad mandate" skeptical organization. Although it was preceded by the Dutch "Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij (VtdK) (1881), which is therefore considered the oldest skeptical organization by others, the VtdK only focuses on fighting quackery, and thus has a 'narrow mandate'. The Comité Para was partly formed as a response to a predatory industry of bogus psychics who were exploiting the grieving relatives of people who had gone missing during the "Second World War. In contrast, "Michael Shermer traces the origins of the modern scientific skeptical movement to "Martin Gardner's 1952 book "Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science.
In 1968, the "French Association for Scientific Information (AFIS) was founded. AFIS strives to promote science against those who deny its cultural value, abuse it for criminal purposes or as a cover for "quackery. According to AFIS, science itself cannot solve humanity's problems, nor can one solve them without using the "scientific method. It maintains that people should be informed about scientific and technical advancements and the problems it helps to solve. Its magazine, Science et pseudo-sciences, attempts to distribute scientific information in a language that everyone can understand.
In 1976, the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), known as the "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) since November 2006, was founded in the "United States. Some see this as the "birth of modern skepticism", however, founder "Paul Kurtz actually modeled it after the Comité Para, including its name. Kurtz' motive was being "dismayed ... by the rising tide of belief in the paranormal and the lack of adequate scientiﬁc examinations of these claims."
Kurtz was an atheist and had also founded the "Committee for the Scientific Examination of Religion. While he saw both aspects as being covered in the skeptical movement, he had recommended CSICOP to focus on paranormal and pseudoscientific claims and to leave religious aspects to others.["citation needed] Despite not being the oldest, CSICOP was "the ﬁrst successful, broad-mandate North American skeptical organization of the contemporary period", popularized the usage of the terms "skeptic", "skeptical" and "skepticism" by its magazine, "Skeptical Inquirer, and directly inspired the foundation of many other skeptical organizations throughout the world, especially in Europe.
These included "Australian Skeptics (1980), "Vetenskap och Folkbildning (Sweden, 1982), "New Zealand Skeptics (1986), "GWUP (Austria, Germany and Switzerland, 1987), "Skepsis r.y. (Finland, 1987), "Stichting Skepsis (Netherlands, 1987), "CICAP (Italy, 1989) and "SKEPP (Dutch-speaking Belgium, 1990).
Besides scientists such as "astronomers, stage magicians like "James Randi were important in investigating charlatans and exposing their trickery. In 1996 Randi formed the "James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) and created the "One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge, where anyone who could demonstrate paranormal abilities, under mutually agreed-upon controlled circumstances, could claim the prize. After Randi's retirement in 2015, the Paranormal Challenge was officially terminated by the JREF with the prize unclaimed:
Effective 9/1/2015 the JREF has made made major changes including converting to a grant making foundation and no longer accepting applications for the Million Dollar Prize from the general public.
Other influential second-generation American organizations were "The Skeptics Society (founded in 1992 by "Michael Shermer), the "New England Skeptical Society (originating in 1996) and the "Independent Investigations Group (formed in 2000 by "James Underdown).
After the "Revolutions of 1989, Eastern Europe saw a surge in quackery and paranormal beliefs that were no longer restrained by the generally secular Communist regimes or the Iron curtain and its information barriers. The foundation of many new skeptical organizations was as well intending to "protect consumers. These included the "Czech Skeptics' Club Sisyfos (1995), the "Hungarian Skeptic Society (2006), the "Polish Sceptics Club (2010) and the Russian-speaking "Skeptic Society (2013). The Austrian Skeptical Society in Vienna (founded in 2002) deals with issues such as "Johann Grander's "vitalized water" and the use of "dowsing at the Austrian Parliament.
The European Skeptics Congress (ESC) has been held throughout Europe since 1989, from 1994 onwards co-ordinated by the "European Council of Skeptical Organizations. In the United States, "The Amaz!ng Meeting (TAM) hosted by the JREF in "Las Vegas had been the most important skeptical conference since 2003, with two spin-off conferences in "London, "UK (2009 and 2010) and one in "Sydney, "Australia (2010). Since 2010, the "Merseyside Skeptics Society and Greater Manchester Skeptics jointly organized "Question, Explore, Discover (QED) in "Manchester, UK. World Skeptics Congresses have been held so far, namely in "Buffalo, New York (1996), "Heidelberg, Germany (1998), Sydney, Australia (2000), "Burbank, California (2002), "Abano Terme, "Italy (2004) and "Berlin, Germany (2012).
In 1991, the "Center for Inquiry, a US think-tank, brought the CSICOP and the "Council for Secular Humanism (CSH) under one umbrella.In January 2016, the "Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science announced its merger with the Center for Inquiry.
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Scientific skepticism|