This section needs additional citations for "verification. (May 2010) ("Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Throughout "Central and Eastern Europe and "Russia|
|"ISO 639-2 / "5||sla|
Political map of Europe with countries where a Slavic language is a national language marked in shades of green. Wood green represents East Slavic languages, pale green represents West Slavic languages, and sea green represents South Slavic languages.
The Slavic languages (also called Slavonic languages) are the "Indo-European languages spoken by the "Slavic peoples. They are thought to descend from a "proto-language called "Proto-Slavic spoken during the "Early Middle Ages, which in turn is thought to have descended from the earlier "Proto-Balto-Slavic language, linking the Slavic languages to the "Baltic languages in a "Balto-Slavic group within the Indo-European family.
The Slavic languages are divided intro three subgroups: "East, "West, and "South, which together constitute more than twenty languages. Of these, ten have at least one million speakers and official status as the "national languages of the countries in which they are predominantly spoken: "Russian, "Belarusian and "Ukrainian (of the East group), "Polish, "Czech and "Slovak (of the West group) and "Slovene, "Serbo-Croatian, "Macedonian and "Bulgarian (of the South group).
The current geographic distribution of natively spoken Slavic languages covers "Eastern Europe, the "Balkans, "Central Europe and all of the territory of "Russia, which includes northern and north-central Asia. Furthermore, the diasporas of many Slavic peoples have established isolated minorities of speakers of their languages all over the world. The number of speakers of all Slavic languages together is estimated to be 315 million.["unreliable source?] Despite the large extent, the individual Slavic languages are considerably less differentiated than Germanic and Romance languages.
Scholars traditionally divide Slavic languages on the basis of geographical and genealogical principle into three main branches, some of which feature subbranches:
Some linguists speculate that a "North Slavic branch has existed as well. The "Old Novgorod dialect may have reflected some idiosyncrasies of this group. "Mutual intelligibility also plays a role in determining the West, East, and South branches. Speakers of languages within the same branch will in most cases be able to understand each other at least partially, but they are generally unable to across branches (for which it would be comparable to a native "English speaker trying to understand any other "Germanic language).
The most obvious differences between the East, West and South Slavic branches are in the orthography of the standard languages: West Slavic languages (and Western South Slavic languages - "Croatian and "Slovene) are written in the "Latin script, and have had more "Western European influence due to their proximity and speakers being historically "Roman Catholic, whereas the East Slavic and Eastern South Slavic languages are written in "Cyrillic and, with "Eastern Orthodox or "Uniate faithful, have had more "Greek influence. East Slavic languages such as Russian have, however, during and after "Peter the Great's Europeanization campaign, absorbed many words of Latin, French, German, and Italian origin.
The tripartite division of the Slavic languages does not take into account the spoken "dialects of each language. Of these, certain so-called transitional dialects and hybrid dialects often bridge the gaps between different languages, showing similarities that do not stand out when comparing Slavic literary (i.e. standard) languages. For example, Slovak (West Slavic) and Ukrainian (East Slavic) are bridged by the "Rusyn language/dialect of Eastern Slovakia and Western Ukraine. Similarly, the Croatian "Kajkavian dialect is more similar to "Slovene than to the standard Croatian language.
Although the Slavic languages diverged from a common "proto-language later than any other group of the "Indo-European language family, enough differences exist between the various Slavic dialects and languages to make communication between speakers of different Slavic languages difficult. Within the individual Slavic languages, dialects may vary to a lesser degree, as those of Russian, or to a much greater degree, as those of Slovene.
|Part of "a series on|
Slavic languages descend from "Proto-Slavic, their immediate "parent language, ultimately deriving from "Proto-Indo-European, the ancestor language of all "Indo-European languages, via a "Proto-Balto-Slavic stage. During the Proto-Balto-Slavic period a number of exclusive "isoglosses in phonology, morphology, lexis, and syntax developed, which makes Slavic and "Baltic the closest related of all the Indo-European branches. The secession of the Balto-Slavic dialect ancestral to Proto-Slavic is estimated on archaeological and glottochronological criteria to have occurred sometime in the period 1500–1000 BCE.
A minority of Baltists maintain the view that the Slavic group of languages differs so radically from the neighboring Baltic group ("Lithuanian, "Latvian, and the now-extinct "Old Prussian), that they could not have shared a parent language after the breakup of the "Proto-Indo-European continuum about five millennia ago. Substantial advances in Balto-Slavic "accentology that occurred in the last three decades, however, make this view very hard to maintain nowadays, especially when one considers that there was most likely no "Proto-Baltic" language and that West Baltic and East Baltic differ from each other as much as each of them does from Proto-Slavic.
This section needs additional citations for "verification. (May 2010) ("Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The imposition of "Church Slavonic on Orthodox Slavs was often at the expense of the vernacular. Says WB Lockwood, a prominent Indo-European linguist, "It ("O.C.S) remained in use to modern times but was more and more influenced by the living, evolving languages, so that one distinguishes Bulgarian, Serbian, and Russian varieties. The use of such media hampered the development of the local languages for literary purposes, and when they do appear the first attempts are usually in an artificially mixed style." (148)
Lockwood also notes that these languages have "enriched" themselves by drawing on Church Slavonic for the vocabulary of abstract concepts. The situation in the Catholic countries, where Latin was more important, was different. The Polish Renaissance poet "Jan Kochanowski and the "Croatian "Baroque writers of the 16th century all wrote in their respective vernaculars (though Polish itself had drawn amply on Latin in the same way Russian would eventually draw on Church Slavonic).
Although Church Slavonic hampered "vernacular literatures, it fostered Slavonic literary activity and abetted linguistic independence from external influences. Only the Croatian vernacular literary tradition nearly matches Church Slavonic in age. It began with the "Vinodol Codex and continued through the Renaissance until the codifications of "Croatian in 1830, though much of the literature between 1300 and 1500 was written in much the same mixture of the vernacular and Church Slavonic as prevailed in Russia and elsewhere.
The most important early monument of Croatian literacy is the "Baška tablet from the late 11th century. It is a large "stone "tablet found in the small "Church of St. Lucy, Jurandvor on the Croatian "island of "Krk, containing text written mostly in "Čakavian dialect in angular Croatian "Glagolitic script. The independence of "Dubrovnik facilitated the continuity of the tradition.
More recent foreign influences follow the same general pattern in Slavic languages as elsewhere and are governed by the political relationships of the Slavs. In the 17th century, bourgeois Russian (delovoi jazyk) absorbed German words through direct contacts between Russians and communities of German settlers in Russia. In the era of "Peter the Great, close contacts with "France invited countless "loan words and "calques from "French, a significant fraction of which not only survived but also replaced older Slavonic loans. In the 19th century, Russian influenced most literary Slavic languages by one means or another.
The "Proto-Slavic language existed until around AD 500. By the 7th century, it had broken apart into large dialectal zones.
There are no reliable hypotheses about the nature of the subsequent breakups of West and South Slavic. East Slavic is generally thought to converge to one "Old Russian or Old East Slavonic language, which existed until at least the 12th century.
Linguistic differentiation was accelerated by the dispersion of the Slavic peoples over a large territory, which in "Central Europe exceeded the current extent of Slavic-speaking majorities. Written documents of the 9th, 10th, and 11th centuries already display some local linguistic features. For example, the "Freising manuscripts show a language that contains some phonetic and lexical elements peculiar to "Slovene dialects (e.g. "rhotacism, the word krilatec). The Freising manuscripts are the first "Latin-script continuous text in a Slavic language.
The migration of Slavic speakers into the Balkans in the declining centuries of the "Byzantine Empire expanded the area of Slavic speech, but the pre-existing writing (notably Greek) survived in this area. The arrival of the "Hungarians in "Pannonia in the 9th century interposed non-Slavic speakers between South and West Slavs. "Frankish conquests completed the geographical separation between these two groups, also severing the connection between Slavs in "Moravia and "Lower Austria ("Moravians) and those in present-day "Styria, "Carinthia, "East Tyrol in "Austria, and in the provinces of modern "Slovenia, where the ancestors of the "Slovenes settled during first colonisation.
The Slavic languages are a relatively homogeneous family, compared with other families of "Indo-European languages (e.g. "Germanic, "Romance, and "Indo-Iranian). As late as the 10th century AD, the entire Slavic-speaking area still functioned as a single, dialectally differentiated language, termed "Common Slavic. Compared with most other Indo-European languages, the Slavic languages are quite conservative, particularly in terms of "morphology (the means of inflecting nouns and verbs to indicate grammatical differences). Most Slavic languages have a rich, "fusional morphology that conserves much of the inflectional morphology of "Proto-Indo-European.
The following table shows the inventory of consonants of Late Common Slavic:
1The sound /sʲ/ did not occur in West Slavic, where it had developed to /ʃ/.
This inventory of sounds is quite similar to what is found in most modern Slavic languages. The extensive series of "palatal consonants, along with the "affricates *ts and *dz, developed through a series of "palatalizations that happened during the "Proto-Slavic period, from earlier sequences either of "velar consonants followed by "front vowels (e.g. *ke, *ki, *ge, *gi, *xe, and *xi), or of various consonants followed by *j (e.g. *tj, *dj, *sj, *zj, *rj, *lj, *kj, and *gj, where *j is the "palatal approximant ([j], the sound of the English letter "y" in "yes" or "you").
The biggest change in this inventory results from a further "general palatalization occurring near the end of the Common Slavic period, where all consonants became palatalized before front vowels. This produced a large number of new palatalized (or "soft") sounds, which formed pairs with the corresponding non-palatalized (or "hard") consonants and absorbed the existing palatalized sounds *lʲ *rʲ *nʲ *sʲ. These sounds were best preserved in Russian but were lost to varying degrees in other languages (particularly Czech and Slovak). The following table shows the inventory of modern Russian:
|"Stop||"p "b||pʲ bʲ||"t "d||tʲ dʲ||"k "ɡ||kʲ ɡʲ|
|"Fricative||"f "v||fʲ vʲ||"s "z||sʲ zʲ||"ʂ "ʐ||"ɕː "ʑː||"x||xʲ|
This general process of palatalization did not occur in Serbo-Croatian and Slovenian. As a result, the modern consonant inventory of these languages is nearly identical to the Late Common Slavic inventory.
Late Common Slavic tolerated relatively few "consonant clusters. However, as a result of the loss of certain formerly present vowels (the weak "yers), the modern Slavic languages allow quite complex clusters, as in the Russian word взблеск "[vzblʲesk] ("flash"). Also present in many Slavic languages are clusters rarely found cross-linguistically, as in Russian ртуть "[rtutʲ] ("mercury") or Polish mchu "[mxu] ("moss", gen. sg.). The word for "mercury" with the initial rt- cluster, for example, is also found in the other East and West Slavic languages, although Slovak retains an epenthetic vowel (ortuť).
A typical vowel inventory is as follows:
The sound ["ɨ] occurs only in some languages (Russian and Belarusian), and even in these languages, it is unclear whether it is its own "phoneme or an "allophone of /i/. Nonetheless, it is a quite prominent and noticeable characteristic of the languages in which it is present.
An area of great difference among Slavic languages is that of "prosody (i.e. syllabic distinctions such as "vowel length, "accent, and "tone). Common Slavic had a complex system of prosody, inherited with little change from "Proto-Indo-European. This consisted of "phonemic vowel length and a free, mobile "pitch accent:
The modern languages vary greatly in the extent to which they preserve this system. On one extreme, Serbo-Croatian preserves the system nearly unchanged (even more so in the conservative "Chakavian dialect); on the other, Macedonian has basically lost the system in its entirety. Between them are found numerous variations:
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (February 2013)
Similarly, Slavic languages have extensive morphophonemic alternations in their derivational and inflectional morphology, including between velar and postalveolar consonants, front and back vowels, and between a vowel and no vowel.
The following is a very brief selection of cognates in basic vocabulary across the Slavic language family, which may serve to give an idea of the sound changes involved. This is not a list of translations: cognates have a common origin, but their meaning may be shifted and loanwords may have replaced them.
|*uxo (ear)||ухо (úkho)||вухо (vúkho)||вуха (vúkha)||ucho||ucho||ucho||uho||уво / uvo; uho||ухо (ukhó)||уво (úvo)|
|*ognь (fire)||огонь (ogónʹ)||вогонь (vohónʹ)||агонь (ahónʹ)||ogień||oheň||oheň||ogenj||огањ / oganj||огън (ógǎn)||оган/огин (ógan/ógin)|
|*ryba (fish)||рыба (rýba)||риба (rýba)||рыба (rýba)||ryba||ryba||ryba||riba||риба / riba||риба (ríba)||риба (ríba)|
|*gnězdo (nest)||гнездо (gnezdó)||гнiздо (hnizdó)||гняздо (hnyazdó)||gniazdo||hnízdo||hniezdo||gnezdo||гн(иј)ездо / gn(ij)ezdo||гнездо (gnezdó)||гнездо (gnézdo)|
|*oko (eye)||око (óko) (dated, poetic or in set expressions)
modern: глаз (glaz)
|око (óko)||вока (vóka)||oko||oko||oko||oko||око / oko||око (óko)||око (óko)|
|*golva (head)||голова (golová)
глава (glavá) "chapter or chief, leader, head"
|голова (holová)||галава (halavá)||głowa||hlava||hlava||glava||глава / glava||глава (glavá)||глава (gláva)|
|*rǫka (hand)||рука (ruká)||рука (ruká)||рука (ruká)||ręka||ruka||ruka||roka||рука / ruka||ръка (rǎká)||рака (ráka)|
|*noktь (night)||ночь (nočʹ)||ніч (nič)||ноч (noč)||noc||noc||noc||noč||ноћ / noć||нощ (nosht)||ноќ (noḱ)|
Most languages of the former "Soviet Union and of some neighbouring countries (for example, "Mongolian) are "significantly influenced by Russian, especially in vocabulary. The "Romanian, "Albanian, and "Hungarian languages show the influence of the neighboring Slavic nations, especially in vocabulary pertaining to urban life, agriculture, and crafts and trade—the major cultural innovations at times of limited long-range cultural contact. In each one of these languages, Slavic lexical borrowings represent at least 20% of the total vocabulary. However, Romanian has much lower influence from Slavic than Albanian or Hungarian["citation needed]. This is because Slavic tribes crossed and partially settled the territories inhabited by ancient Illyrians and Vlachs on their way to the Balkans.
Although also spoken in neighbouring lands, the "Germanic languages show less significant Slavic influence, partly because Slavic migrations were mostly headed south rather than west. Slavic tribes did push westwards into Germanic territory, but borrowing for the most part seems to have been from Germanic to Slavic rather than the other way: for instance, the now-extinct "Polabian language was heavily influenced by German, far more than any living Slavic language today. The Slavic contributions to Germanic languages remains a moot question, though "Max Vasmer, a specialist in Slavic etymology, has claimed that there were no Slavic loans into "Proto-Germanic. The only Germanic languages that shows significant Slavic influence are "Yiddish and the historical colonial dialects of German that were spoken East of the "Oder–Neisse line, such as "Silesian German (formerly spoken in "Silesia and South of "East Prussia) and the Eastern varieties of "East Low German, with the exception of "Low Prussian, which had a strong "Baltic "substratum. Modern Dutch slang, especially the Amsterdam dialect, borrowed much from Yiddish in turn. However, there are isolated Slavic loans (mostly recent) into other Germanic languages. For example, the word for "border" (in modern "German Grenze, "Dutch grens) was borrowed from the Common Slavic granica. There are, however, many cities and villages of Slavic origin in Eastern Germany, the largest of which are "Berlin, "Leipzig and "Dresden. English derives "quark (a kind of cheese, not the "subatomic particle) from the German Quark, which in turn is derived from the Slavic tvarog, which means "curd". Many German surnames, particularly in Eastern Germany and Austria, are Slavic in origin. "Swedish also has torg (market place) from Old Russian tъrgъ or Polish targ, tolk (interpreter) from Old Slavic tlŭkŭ, and pråm (barge) from West Slavonic pramŭ.
The "Czech word robot is now found in most languages worldwide, and the word pistol, probably also from Czech,["citation needed] is found in many Indo-European languages, including "Greek (πιστόλι, pistóli).
A well-known Slavic word in almost all European languages is "vodka, a borrowing from Russian водка (vodka) – which itself was borrowed from Polish wódka (lit. "little water"), from common Slavic voda ("water", "cognate to the English word) with the "diminutive ending "-ka". Owing to the medieval "fur trade with Northern Russia, Pan-European loans from Russian include such familiar words as "sable. The English word ""vampire" was borrowed (perhaps via "French vampire) from "German Vampir, in turn derived from Serbian vampir, continuing "Proto-Slavic *ǫpyrь, although "Polish scholar K. Stachowski has argued that the origin of the word is early Slavic *vąpěrь, going back to Turkic oobyr. Several European languages, including "English, have borrowed the word "polje (meaning "large, flat plain") directly from the former "Yugoslav languages (i.e. "Slovene, "Croatian, and "Serbian). During the heyday of the "USSR in the 20th century, many more Russian words became known worldwide: da, "Soviet, "sputnik, "perestroika, "glasnost, "kolkhoz, etc. Also in the English language borrowed from Russian is "samovar (lit. "self-boiling") to refer to the specific Russian tea urn.
Para- and supranational languages
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Slavic languages.|