Powered by
TTSReader
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia


This page offers some principles of etiquette, also referred to as "Wikiquette", on how to work with others on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia's contributors come from many different countries and cultures. We have many different views, perspectives, opinions, and backgrounds, sometimes varying widely. Treating others with respect is key to collaborating effectively in building an international online encyclopedia.

Contents

Principles of Wikipedia etiquette[edit]

Avoid indirect criticism[edit]

"Shortcut

Avoid use of unexplained "scare quotes and other means of implying criticism or making indirect criticism when you are writing in edit comments and talk pages. Criticism of another's edit, of phrasing and choice of terminology, or any criticism of, or critical response to, talk page commentary and participation ought to be made clearly, directly, and explicitly in a manner that may be easily understood and replied to, out of respect for other editors.

Keep in mind that sarcasm cannot easily be conveyed in writing and may be misinterpreted. Insinuation, "double entendre, and excessive or unwarranted subtlety of writing should be avoided when expressing criticism—particularly negative criticism. This point of etiquette also helps the editor receiving criticism to correctly understand you and respond to your concerns, and may particularly help editors for whom "English is a second language or who have trouble understanding written English.

When this style of communication is necessary in the interest of being concise or illustrative, it is best to explain the intended meaning of your use of scare quotes or other indirection immediately afterward.

Of course criticism communicated in any manner and concerning any subject must be "civil, should assume good faith as described in the "relevant guideline, should not constitute "biting of newcomers, and should comply with other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If directed generally towards an editor's behavior or other aspects of talk page commentary, criticism must not constitute a personal attack as described in the ""no personal attacks" policy. See also the essay ""Avoid personal remarks" for a viewpoint on the latter form of criticism.

How to avoid abuse of talk pages[edit]

"Shortcut

Working towards a neutral point of view[edit]

When dealing with suspected violations of "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view:

  1. Inquire politely on the article's talk page about aspects of the article you consider non-NPOV (unless they are really egregious), and suggest replacements.
  2. If no reply comes, make the substitutions. (Use your watchlist to keep track of what you want to do.)
  3. If a reply comes, try to agree about the wording to be used. That way, when an agreement is reached, an edit war is very unlikely. This has the disadvantage that the article stays in an unsatisfying state for a longer period, but an article that changes frequently does not create a good impression with other Wikipedians or of the project as a whole.

A few things to bear in mind[edit]

Other words of advice[edit]

"Shortcut

Parting words of advice from "Larry Sanger:[1]

For more advice of a similar nature, see "User:Kingturtle/WikiPrinciples.

See also[edit]

Policies and guidelines
Other related pages

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Posted by "Larry Sanger on his user page on February 14, 2003
) ) WikipediaAudio is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the WikiMedia Foundation.