See more Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy articles on AOD.

Powered by
Share this page on
Article provided by Wikipedia

( => ( => ( => Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy [pageid] => 14681769 ) =>


Any philosophical insight that would be useful for the improvement of "Draft:Comparison would be appreciated. Cheers! "bd2412 "T 19:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Missing topic[edit]

When researching "polychora, I came across the idea that "spirits are "four-dimensional beings. However, I do not see this anywhere on Wikipedia. "LaundryPizza03 ("talk) 09:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Unity in diversity[edit]

Could I get some feedback on "Unity in diversity? Sometime back in April 2017 the page was significantly altered to state that "Unity in diversity" was merely a political motto, but I feel like there's a good case for it being more of an overarching philosophical concept—even if the phrase itself is sometimes used as a slogan. The Lalonde ref on that page mentions that the concept was current in Taoist societies as well as in Ancient Greece, but all I've been able to find so far was its treatment by "Ibn al-Arabi and his followers. Would anyone else have any leads on good sources to expand this article? "dragfyre_"ʞןɐʇ"c 15:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

"Henry Clay Brockmeyer[edit]

I just put together a biography of this German-born Hegelian, who seems like he was important in the early history of Hegel in America and of the "St. Louis Movement". If anyone wants to look it over and maybe find something better to say about his impact, that would be great. Anyways, there is at least something on him now. "Brianyoumans ("talk) 19:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

"Value theory needs your help[edit]

"Value theory is overly essay-like and needs more citations to sources.

Would anyone here care to review and improve this article?

Thanks -- " (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Topics in Metaphysics[edit]

Someone has been repeatedly removing much of the content of the article "Metaphysics listing the central topics of the field (in a structure closely mirroring other authoritative sources like SEP) citing poor referencing for those being within the domain of metaphysics. Some other editors' attention there would be appreciated. --"Pfhorrest ("talk) 18:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Critique of Pure Reason[edit]

Hello. I have a dispute with Διοτιμα at the article "Critique of Pure Reason. I have attempted to engage with this user and discuss the dispute at the article's talk page. He has, however, ignored me. I would welcome any comments on the issue, whatever they are, from editors interested in philosophy. "FreeKnowledgeCreator ("talk) 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

This user has also tampered with "Fundamental ontology. Their latest additions seem to be a personal interpretation of "Being and Time. --"Omnipaedista ("talk) 00:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
) )